From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>,
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Opportunistically reduce flushing at execbuf
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:08:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418526504-26316-5-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418526504-26316-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
If we're moving a bunch of buffers from the CPU domain to the GPU domain, and
we've already blown out the entire cache via a wbinvd, there is nothing more to
do.
With this and the previous patches, I am seeing a 3x FPS increase on a certain
benchmark which uses a giant 2d array texture. Unless I missed something in the
code, it should only effect non-LLC i915 platforms.
I haven't yet run any numbers for other benchmarks, nor have I attempted to
check if various conformance tests still pass.
NOTE: As mentioned in the previous patch, if one can easily obtain the largest
buffer and attempt to flush it first, the results would be even more desirable.
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 12 +++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 8 +++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 8 +++++---
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index d68c75f..fdb92a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2642,7 +2642,8 @@ static inline bool i915_stop_ring_allow_warn(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
}
void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev);
-bool i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool force);
+enum drm_cache_flush
+i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool force);
int __must_check i915_gem_object_finish_gpu(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
int __must_check i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev);
int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index de241eb..3746738 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3608,7 +3608,7 @@ err_unpin:
return vma;
}
-bool
+enum drm_cache_flush
i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
bool force)
{
@@ -3617,14 +3617,14 @@ i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
* again at bind time.
*/
if (obj->pages == NULL)
- return false;
+ return DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_NONE;
/*
* Stolen memory is always coherent with the GPU as it is explicitly
* marked as wc by the system, or the system is cache-coherent.
*/
if (obj->stolen || obj->phys_handle)
- return false;
+ return DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_NONE;
/* If the GPU is snooping the contents of the CPU cache,
* we do not need to manually clear the CPU cache lines. However,
@@ -3635,12 +3635,10 @@ i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
* tracking.
*/
if (!force && cpu_cache_is_coherent(obj->base.dev, obj->cache_level))
- return false;
+ return DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_NONE;
trace_i915_gem_object_clflush(obj);
- drm_clflush_sg(obj->pages);
-
- return true;
+ return drm_clflush_sg(obj->pages);
}
/** Flushes the GTT write domain for the object if it's dirty. */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 0c25f62..e8eb9e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_gpu(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
{
struct i915_vma *vma;
uint32_t flush_domains = 0;
- bool flush_chipset = false;
+ enum drm_cache_flush flush_chipset = DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_NONE;
int ret;
list_for_each_entry(vma, vmas, exec_list) {
@@ -836,8 +836,10 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_gpu(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)
- flush_chipset |= i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, false);
+ if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU &&
+ flush_chipset != DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_WBINVD) {
+ flush_chipset = i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, false);
+ }
flush_domains |= obj->base.write_domain;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 89b5577..a6c6ebd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int execlists_move_to_gpu(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf,
struct intel_engine_cs *ring = ringbuf->ring;
struct i915_vma *vma;
uint32_t flush_domains = 0;
- bool flush_chipset = false;
+ enum drm_cache_flush flush_chipset = DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_NONE;
int ret;
list_for_each_entry(vma, vmas, exec_list) {
@@ -621,8 +621,10 @@ static int execlists_move_to_gpu(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)
- flush_chipset |= i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, false);
+ if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU &&
+ flush_chipset != DRM_CACHE_FLUSH_WBINVD) {
+ flush_chipset = i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, false);
+ }
flush_domains |= obj->base.write_domain;
}
--
2.1.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-14 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1418526504-26316-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
2014-12-14 3:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/cache: Use wbinvd helpers Ben Widawsky
2014-12-14 12:43 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-15 7:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH] [v2] " Ben Widawsky
2014-12-16 2:26 ` shuang.he
2014-12-16 7:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-14 3:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/cache: Try to be smarter about clflushing on x86 Ben Widawsky
2014-12-14 4:15 ` Matt Turner
2014-12-15 22:07 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-12-14 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2014-12-15 4:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-12-15 19:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-12-14 3:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/cache: Return what type of cache flush occurred Ben Widawsky
2014-12-14 3:08 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2014-12-14 9:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Opportunistically reduce flushing at execbuf shuang.he
2014-12-14 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2014-12-14 23:37 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-12-15 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-12-15 8:20 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-15 19:56 ` Ben Widawsky
2014-12-15 20:39 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-15 21:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ben Widawsky
2014-12-16 7:57 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-16 19:38 ` Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418526504-26316-5-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--to=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox