From: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Correct the IOSF Dev_FN field for IOSF transfers
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:10:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423136456-16778-1-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com> (raw)
As per the specififcation, the SB_DevFn is the PCI_DEVFN of the target
device and not the source. So PCI_DEVFN(2,0) is not correct. Further the
port ID should be enough to identify devices unless they are MFD. The
SB_DevFn was intended to remove ambiguity in case of these MFD devices.
For non MFD devices the recommendation for the target device IP was to
ignore these fields, but not all of them followed the recommendation.
Some like CCK ignore these fields and hence PCI_DEVFN(2, 0) works and so
does PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) as it works for DPIO. The issue came to light because
of GPIONC which was not getting programmed correctly with PCI_DEVFN(2, 0).
It turned out that this did not follow the recommendation and expected 0
in this field.
In general the recommendation is to use SB_DevFn as PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) for
all devices except target PCI devices.
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
index 01d841e..731b10a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ u32 vlv_punit_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 addr)
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, addr, &val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void vlv_punit_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 addr, u32 val)
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, addr, &val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
}
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ u32 vlv_bunit_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ u32 vlv_bunit_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
void vlv_bunit_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ u32 vlv_nc_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 addr)
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_NC,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_NC,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, addr, &val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
@@ -132,56 +132,56 @@ u32 vlv_nc_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 addr)
u32 vlv_gpio_nc_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_gpio_nc_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
u32 vlv_cck_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_cck_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
u32 vlv_ccu_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_ccu_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
u32 vlv_gps_core_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_gps_core_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-05 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 11:40 Shobhit Kumar [this message]
2015-02-05 17:14 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Correct the IOSF Dev_FN field for IOSF transfers Ville Syrjälä
2015-02-06 8:50 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-06 10:45 ` Shobhit Kumar
2015-02-09 11:16 ` Shobhit Kumar
2015-02-09 12:27 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-05 22:39 ` shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1423136456-16778-1-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
--to=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox