public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Try to sort out ironlake_check_fdi_lanes()
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:28:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426145325.2645.5.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426092751-20036-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 18:52 +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> So these on top of Ander's latest FDI bifurcation patch [1] should hopefully
> result in something sane. Didn't test them though, but assuming Ander
> has that test somewhere maybe some of the problematic cases I identified [2]
> could be checked with these.

I run the tests I wrote here and they all passed. However, the tests
don't cover the eDP on pipe C case. Moreover, I don't have an IVB laptop
I could use for testing that case.

Ander

> [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-March/061802.html
> [2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-March/061806.html
> 
> Ville Syrjälä (2):
>   drm/i915: Rewrite some some of the FDI lane checks
>   drm/i915: Rewrite IVB FDI bifurcation conflict checks
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-12  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-11 16:52 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Try to sort out ironlake_check_fdi_lanes() ville.syrjala
2015-03-11 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Rewrite some some of the FDI lane checks ville.syrjala
2015-03-11 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Rewrite IVB FDI bifurcation conflict checks ville.syrjala
2015-03-12  7:35   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-03-12  9:51     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-12  7:28 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1426145325.2645.5.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox