From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] tests: Add KMS blob-property test
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:38:28 +0100
Message-ID: <1431445108.3243.0@mail.collabora.com>
References: <1431183433-14960-1-git-send-email-daniels@collabora.com>
 <CANkqdn1BcByGPKt+evamefKuYpX44q1a75h=7dSVx2LM0hpKRw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0142953430=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [93.93.135.160])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34A172181
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANkqdn1BcByGPKt+evamefKuYpX44q1a75h=7dSVx2LM0hpKRw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============0142953430==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-rJAtkZEEXoxAEbuZg+4T"

--=-rJAtkZEEXoxAEbuZg+4T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi,

On Tue, 12 May, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com> 
wrote:
> On 9 May 2015 at 15:57, Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> wrote:
>>  Exercises the new blob-creation ioctl, testing lifetimes and 
>> behaviour
>>  of user-created blobs, as well as exercising all the invariant
>>  conditions we guarantee from modes exposed as blob properties.
> 
> Since this isn't really a kms test, the test name should probably be
> prefixed with "core", rather than "kms". The "core" prefix is used for
> tests of drm ioctls and behaviour.

Fair point, well made; will respin.

Cheers,
Daniel

--=-rJAtkZEEXoxAEbuZg+4T
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Hi,<br><br>On Tue, 12 May, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Thomas Wood &lt;thomas.wood@intel.com&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><div class="plaintext" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">On 9 May 2015 at 15:57, Daniel Stone &lt;<a href="mailto:daniels@collabora.com">daniels@collabora.com</a>&gt; wrote:
<blockquote> Exercises the new blob-creation ioctl, testing lifetimes and behaviour
 of user-created blobs, as well as exercising all the invariant
 conditions we guarantee from modes exposed as blob properties.
</blockquote>
Since this isn't really a kms test, the test name should probably be
prefixed with "core", rather than "kms". The "core" prefix is used for
tests of drm ioctls and behaviour.</div></blockquote><br><div>Fair point, well made; will respin.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Daniel</div>
--=-rJAtkZEEXoxAEbuZg+4T--


--===============0142953430==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSW50ZWwtZ2Z4
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApJbnRlbC1nZnhAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0
cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pbnRlbC1nZngK

--===============0142953430==--