* [PATCH] drm/i915: Update rps frequencies for BXT
@ 2015-06-25 21:54 Bob Paauwe
2015-06-26 12:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-06-28 0:54 ` shuang.he
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bob Paauwe @ 2015-06-25 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Broxton is using a different register and different bit ordering
for rps status capabilities.
Also GT perf freqency register is different for Broxton so update
that.
Signed-off-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index f3b8062..8a2a456a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1132,9 +1132,9 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
(rgvstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >> MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT);
} else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) ||
IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_GEN9(dev)) {
- u32 gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS);
- u32 rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS);
- u32 rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
+ u32 rp_state_limits;
+ u32 gt_perf_status;
+ u32 rp_state_cap;
u32 rpmodectl, rpinclimit, rpdeclimit;
u32 rpstat, cagf, reqf;
u32 rpupei, rpcurup, rpprevup;
@@ -1142,6 +1142,15 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
u32 pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask;
int max_freq;
+ rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS);
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+ rp_state_cap = I915_READ(BXT_RP_STATE_CAP);
+ gt_perf_status = I915_READ(BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS);
+ } else {
+ rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
+ gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS);
+ }
+
/* RPSTAT1 is in the GT power well */
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (ret)
@@ -1229,7 +1238,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
seq_printf(m, "Down threshold: %d%%\n",
dev_priv->rps.down_threshold);
- max_freq = (rp_state_cap & 0xff0000) >> 16;
+ max_freq = (IS_BROXTON(dev) ? rp_state_cap >> 0 :
+ rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
max_freq *= (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) ? GEN9_FREQ_SCALER : 1);
seq_printf(m, "Lowest (RPN) frequency: %dMHz\n",
intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, max_freq));
@@ -1239,7 +1249,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
seq_printf(m, "Nominal (RP1) frequency: %dMHz\n",
intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, max_freq));
- max_freq = rp_state_cap & 0xff;
+ max_freq = (IS_BROXTON(dev) ? rp_state_cap >> 16 :
+ rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
max_freq *= (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) ? GEN9_FREQ_SCALER : 1);
seq_printf(m, "Max non-overclocked (RP0) frequency: %dMHz\n",
intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, max_freq));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index fa9ccb87..17b5ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2734,8 +2734,10 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
#define GEN6_GT_THREAD_STATUS_CORE_MASK 0x7
#define GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5948)
+#define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070)
#define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994)
#define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998)
+#define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP 0x138170
#define INTERVAL_1_28_US(us) (((us) * 100) >> 7)
#define INTERVAL_1_33_US(us) (((us) * 3) >> 2)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 32ff034..213da42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4288,13 +4288,21 @@ static void gen6_init_rps_frequencies(struct drm_device *dev)
u32 ddcc_status = 0;
int ret;
- rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
/* All of these values are in units of 50MHz */
dev_priv->rps.cur_freq = 0;
/* static values from HW: RP0 > RP1 > RPn (min_freq) */
- dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
- dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
- dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+ rp_state_cap = I915_READ(BXT_RP_STATE_CAP);
+ dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
+ dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
+ dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
+ } else {
+ rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
+ dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
+ dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
+ dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
+ }
+
if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
/* Store the frequency values in 16.66 MHZ units, which is
the natural hardware unit for SKL */
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Update rps frequencies for BXT
2015-06-25 21:54 [PATCH] drm/i915: Update rps frequencies for BXT Bob Paauwe
@ 2015-06-26 12:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-06-28 0:54 ` shuang.he
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2015-06-26 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bob Paauwe; +Cc: intel-gfx
On to, 2015-06-25 at 14:54 -0700, Bob Paauwe wrote:
> Broxton is using a different register and different bit ordering
> for rps status capabilities.
>
> Also GT perf freqency register is different for Broxton so update
> that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index f3b8062..8a2a456a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1132,9 +1132,9 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> (rgvstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >> MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT);
> } else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) ||
> IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_GEN9(dev)) {
> - u32 gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS);
> - u32 rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS);
> - u32 rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
> + u32 rp_state_limits;
> + u32 gt_perf_status;
> + u32 rp_state_cap;
> u32 rpmodectl, rpinclimit, rpdeclimit;
> u32 rpstat, cagf, reqf;
> u32 rpupei, rpcurup, rpprevup;
> @@ -1142,6 +1142,15 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> u32 pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask;
> int max_freq;
>
> + rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS);
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> + rp_state_cap = I915_READ(BXT_RP_STATE_CAP);
> + gt_perf_status = I915_READ(BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS);
> + } else {
> + rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
> + gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS);
> + }
> +
> /* RPSTAT1 is in the GT power well */
> ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1229,7 +1238,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> seq_printf(m, "Down threshold: %d%%\n",
> dev_priv->rps.down_threshold);
>
> - max_freq = (rp_state_cap & 0xff0000) >> 16;
> + max_freq = (IS_BROXTON(dev) ? rp_state_cap >> 0 :
> + rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
> max_freq *= (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) ? GEN9_FREQ_SCALER : 1);
> seq_printf(m, "Lowest (RPN) frequency: %dMHz\n",
> intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, max_freq));
> @@ -1239,7 +1249,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> seq_printf(m, "Nominal (RP1) frequency: %dMHz\n",
> intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, max_freq));
>
> - max_freq = rp_state_cap & 0xff;
> + max_freq = (IS_BROXTON(dev) ? rp_state_cap >> 16 :
> + rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
> max_freq *= (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) ? GEN9_FREQ_SCALER : 1);
> seq_printf(m, "Max non-overclocked (RP0) frequency: %dMHz\n",
> intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, max_freq));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index fa9ccb87..17b5ca2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2734,8 +2734,10 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define GEN6_GT_THREAD_STATUS_CORE_MASK 0x7
>
> #define GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5948)
> +#define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070)
Nitpick: the format in GT_PERF_STATUS is the same on SKL and BXT so you
could have redefined GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS to be a wrapper macro similar
to what you did in v1 of this patch.
> #define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994)
> #define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP (MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998)
> +#define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP 0x138170
>
> #define INTERVAL_1_28_US(us) (((us) * 100) >> 7)
> #define INTERVAL_1_33_US(us) (((us) * 3) >> 2)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 32ff034..213da42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4288,13 +4288,21 @@ static void gen6_init_rps_frequencies(struct drm_device *dev)
> u32 ddcc_status = 0;
> int ret;
>
> - rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
> /* All of these values are in units of 50MHz */
On SKL/BXT the unit is 16.66MHz, so the above comment could be
clarified.
> dev_priv->rps.cur_freq = 0;
> /* static values from HW: RP0 > RP1 > RPn (min_freq) */
> - dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
> - dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
> - dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> + rp_state_cap = I915_READ(BXT_RP_STATE_CAP);
> + dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
> + dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
> + dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
> + } else {
> + rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
> + dev_priv->rps.rp0_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 0) & 0xff;
> + dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 8) & 0xff;
> + dev_priv->rps.min_freq = (rp_state_cap >> 16) & 0xff;
> + }
> +
Nitpick: this could be factored out to a separate function returning
rpn,rp0,rp1 which could be also used then in i915_frequency_info.
All the above can be addressed as a follow-up, so this patch looks ok to
me:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
> /* Store the frequency values in 16.66 MHZ units, which is
> the natural hardware unit for SKL */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Update rps frequencies for BXT
2015-06-25 21:54 [PATCH] drm/i915: Update rps frequencies for BXT Bob Paauwe
2015-06-26 12:52 ` Imre Deak
@ 2015-06-28 0:54 ` shuang.he
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: shuang.he @ 2015-06-28 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shuang.he, lei.a.liu, intel-gfx, bob.j.paauwe
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Task id: 6563
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK 303/303 303/303
SNB 312/312 312/312
IVB 343/343 343/343
BYT 284/284 284/284
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-28 0:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-25 21:54 [PATCH] drm/i915: Update rps frequencies for BXT Bob Paauwe
2015-06-26 12:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-06-28 0:54 ` shuang.he
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox