From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: don't increment the FBC threshold at fbc_enable
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:53:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435672392-7329-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435672392-7329-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
We first set the threshold value when we're allocating the CFB, and
then later at {ilk,gen7}_fbc_enable() we increment it in case we're
using 16bpp. While that is correct, it is dangerous: if we rework the
code a little bit in a way that allows us to call intel_fbc_enable()
without necessarily calling i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression() first,
we might end up incrementing threshold more than once. To prevent
that, increment a temporary variable instead.
v2: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
index 50ed333..9e55b9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
@@ -188,14 +188,15 @@ static void ilk_fbc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(fb);
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
u32 dpfc_ctl;
+ int threshold = dev_priv->fbc.threshold;
dev_priv->fbc.enabled = true;
dpfc_ctl = DPFC_CTL_PLANE(intel_crtc->plane);
if (drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0) == 2)
- dev_priv->fbc.threshold++;
+ threshold++;
- switch (dev_priv->fbc.threshold) {
+ switch (threshold) {
case 4:
case 3:
dpfc_ctl |= DPFC_CTL_LIMIT_4X;
@@ -259,6 +260,7 @@ static void gen7_fbc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(fb);
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
u32 dpfc_ctl;
+ int threshold = dev_priv->fbc.threshold;
dev_priv->fbc.enabled = true;
@@ -267,9 +269,9 @@ static void gen7_fbc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
dpfc_ctl |= IVB_DPFC_CTL_PLANE(intel_crtc->plane);
if (drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0) == 2)
- dev_priv->fbc.threshold++;
+ threshold++;
- switch (dev_priv->fbc.threshold) {
+ switch (threshold) {
case 4:
case 3:
dpfc_ctl |= DPFC_CTL_LIMIT_4X;
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 13:53 [PATCH 0/8] FBC locking v3 Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2015-06-30 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: don't increment the FBC threshold at fbc_enable Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 13:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: add the FBC mutex Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:10 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:12 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:25 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:34 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: remove unneded locks on debugs FBC functions Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: remove struct_mutex lock from the FBC work function Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: simplify FBC start/stop at invalidate/flush Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:34 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 21:12 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-07-01 14:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: add struct_mutex WARNs to i915_gem_stolen.c Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:15 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:26 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:36 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 20:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-06-30 21:00 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 13:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-01 15:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-07-01 15:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-30 14:34 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 14:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-01 14:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 14:03 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: reduce struct_mutex coverage at intel_crtc_page_flip() Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: remove struct_mutex lock from intel_modeset_cleanup() Paulo Zanoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435672392-7329-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
--to=przanoni@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox