From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: simplify FBC start/stop at invalidate/flush
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:53:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435672392-7329-6-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435672392-7329-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
The problem with calling intel_fbc_update() at flush is that it fully
rechecks and recomputes the FBC state, and that includes reallocating
the CFB, which requires a struct_mutex lock that we don't always have.
The lack of struct_mutex lock can be considered a regression from:
commit dbef0f15b5c83231dacb214dbf9a6dba063ca21c
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:23:46 2015 -0200
drm/i915: add frontbuffer tracking to FBC
So introduce intel_fbc_stop() that doesn't unset fbc.crtc, then call
stop/enable at invalidate/flush.
Notice that invalidate/flush is only called by the frontbuffer
tracking infrastrucutre, so it's safe to not do a full
intel_fbc_update() here.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
index 316feb1..0a66814 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void intel_fbc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
schedule_delayed_work(&work->work, msecs_to_jiffies(50));
}
-static void __intel_fbc_disable(struct drm_device *dev)
+static void intel_fbc_stop(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
@@ -434,6 +434,13 @@ static void __intel_fbc_disable(struct drm_device *dev)
return;
dev_priv->display.disable_fbc(dev);
+}
+
+static void __intel_fbc_disable(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+ intel_fbc_stop(dev);
dev_priv->fbc.crtc = NULL;
}
@@ -753,7 +760,7 @@ void intel_fbc_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits |= (fbc_bits & frontbuffer_bits);
if (dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits)
- __intel_fbc_disable(dev);
+ intel_fbc_stop(dev);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
}
@@ -770,8 +777,11 @@ void intel_fbc_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits &= ~frontbuffer_bits;
- if (!dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits)
- __intel_fbc_update(dev);
+ if (!dev_priv->fbc.busy_bits && dev_priv->fbc.crtc) {
+ if (dev_priv->fbc.enabled)
+ intel_fbc_stop(dev);
+ intel_fbc_enable(&dev_priv->fbc.crtc->base);
+ }
out:
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 13:53 [PATCH 0/8] FBC locking v3 Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: don't increment the FBC threshold at fbc_enable Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:22 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 13:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: add the FBC mutex Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:10 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:12 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:25 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:34 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: remove unneded locks on debugs FBC functions Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: remove struct_mutex lock from the FBC work function Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2015-06-30 14:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: simplify FBC start/stop at invalidate/flush Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 21:12 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-07-01 14:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: add struct_mutex WARNs to i915_gem_stolen.c Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:15 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 14:26 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 14:36 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-30 20:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-06-30 21:00 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 13:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-01 15:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-07-01 15:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-30 14:34 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 14:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-01 14:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-01 14:03 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: reduce struct_mutex coverage at intel_crtc_page_flip() Paulo Zanoni
2015-06-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: remove struct_mutex lock from intel_modeset_cleanup() Paulo Zanoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435672392-7329-6-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
--to=przanoni@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox