From: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink.
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:16:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440454646.3879.93.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440425051.2526.14.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 14:04 +0000, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Em Qui, 2015-08-20 às 17:55 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> > This is wrong since my commit (89251b17). The intention of that
> > commit was to remove this one here that is also wrong anyway,
> > but it was forgotten.
>
> You mentioned the current code is wrong, but it would be really nice
> if
> you could describe why it is wrong and what are the implications of
> it
> being wrong. Was this causing some specific problem or was it just
> found by code inspection? In case it was found just by code
> inspection,
> you could try to elaborate on the possible problems brought by the
> bad
> commit.
nothing critical, by wrong I meant "& ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE" doesn't
do anything at all.... I don't remember if when I added I intended to
be informative or I removed the val read from dpdc and forgot to remove
this part...
>
> A more elaborate description helps not only the reviewers, but also
> the
> possible backporters and even helps us judging whether it should be
> merged by Daniel or Jani.
>
> Anyway, as far as I see the patch looks correct, so if you could
> provide another paragraph for Daniel to amend on the commit message:
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Thanks
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index a04b4dc..51f0514 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -170,9 +170,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >
> > aux_clock_divider = intel_dp
> > ->get_aux_clock_divider(intel_dp, 0);
> >
> > - drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
> > - DP_PSR_ENABLE &
> > ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE);
> > -
> > /* Enable AUX frame sync at sink */
> > if (dev_priv->psr.aux_frame_sync)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 0:55 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Fix PSR disable sequence on core platforms Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-24 14:14 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:18 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-24 14:29 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:28 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: PSR: Mask LPSP hw tracking back again Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-26 9:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-26 1:56 ` [4/7] " Brian Norris
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-24 17:03 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:35 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Remove psr re-activation delay on HSW+ Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-21 0:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Reduce PSR re-activation time for VLV/CHV Rodrigo Vivi
2015-08-28 23:38 ` shuang.he
2015-08-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-08-24 22:16 ` Vivi, Rodrigo [this message]
2015-09-26 1:40 ` [1/7] " Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440454646.3879.93.camel@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox