From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] Atomic watermark updates (v4)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:19:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442283570-26824-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
Previous revision is here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-August/074161.html
Key changes:
- Lots of bugfixes from review comments by Ander and Ville (and a couple I
found on my own)
- We now keep the active watermarks in intel_crtc, but pre-calculate to future
watermarks in intel_crtc_state. The values stored in the state have been
renamed to 'optimal' and 'intermediate' for clarity.
- The interface exposed by platforms that can do atomic updates has changed
slightly. .initial_watermarks() and .optimize_watermarks() are the two
routines called by the device-independent code to program the precomputed
watermarks. These functions handle the locking, the copy of values from
cstate->wm to intel_crtc->wm.active, and the actual programming (if needed).
- Added the wm_mutex in preparation for async.
A few patches from previous iterations have been left out of this series:
- Async watermark optimization. I had this in an earlier series, but Maarten
indicated that it would clash with his ongoing work. I'll bring back the
async patch in the future once his work lands.
- SKL/BXT version. I have some gen9 code that should plug into this
framework (gen9 only requires one-step programming), but haven't had a
chance to test it yet. I should be able to give it a spin on BXT hardware
soon, so I'll wait until I've done that before reposting the gen9-specific
followups.
Also note that after some mailing list / IRC discussion, we've decided not to
perform modesets in a two-step process that was being discussed as a potential
prereq for this, so my experimental prereq patches to do that have been
dropped.
Matt Roper (13):
drm/i915: Drop redundant watermark programming
drm/i915: Eliminate usage of plane_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM
code (v2)
drm/i915: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM (v2)
drm/i915: Determine I915_MAX_PLANES from plane enum
drm/i915/skl: Simplify wm structures slightly (v2)
drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM
(v2)
drm/i915/ivb: Move WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling w/a to atomic check
drm/i915: Drop intel_update_sprite_watermarks
drm/i915: Calculate pipe watermarks into CRTC state (v3)
drm/i915: Calculate ILK-style watermarks during atomic check (v3)
drm/i915: Don't set plane visible during HW readout if CRTC is off
drm/i915: Calculate watermark configuration during atomic check (v2)
drm/i915: Add two-stage ILK-style watermark programming (v4)
Ville Syrjälä (1):
drm/i915: Refactor ilk_update_wm (v3)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 41 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 194 ++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 79 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 849 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 15 -
7 files changed, 637 insertions(+), 545 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 2:19 Matt Roper [this message]
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Drop redundant watermark programming Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Eliminate usage of plane_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM code (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Determine I915_MAX_PLANES from plane enum Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/skl: Simplify wm structures slightly (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/skl: Eliminate usage of pipe_wm_parameters from SKL-style WM (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-17 13:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/ivb: Move WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling w/a to atomic check Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Drop intel_update_sprite_watermarks Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Refactor ilk_update_wm (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Calculate pipe watermarks into CRTC state (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Calculate ILK-style watermarks during atomic check (v3) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Don't set plane visible during HW readout if CRTC is off Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Calculate watermark configuration during atomic check (v2) Matt Roper
2015-09-15 2:19 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Add two-stage ILK-style watermark programming (v4) Matt Roper
2015-09-17 12:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-17 13:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-17 13:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-23 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442283570-26824-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox