public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/bxt: work around HW context corruption due to coherency problem
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:17:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442506664-20159-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442506664-20159-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>

The execlist context object is mapped with a CPU/GPU coherent mapping
everywhere, but on BXT A stepping due to a HW issue the coherency is not
guaranteed. To work around this flush the context object after pinning
it (to flush cache lines left by the context initialization/read-back
from backing storage) and mark it as uncached so later updates during
context switching will be coherent.

I noticed this problem via a GPU hang, where IPEHR pointed to an invalid
opcode value. I couldn't find this value on the ring but looking at the
contents of the active context object it turned out to be a parameter
dword of a bigger command there. The original command opcode itself
was zeroed out, based on the above I assume due to a CPU writeback of
the corresponding cacheline. When restoring the context the GPU would
jump over the zeroed out opcode and hang when trying to execute the
above parameter dword.

I could easily reproduce this by running igt/gem_render_copy_redux and
gem_tiled_blits/basic in parallel, but I guess it could be triggered by
anything involving frequent switches between two separate contexts. With
this workaround I couldn't reproduce the problem.

v2:
- instead of clflushing after updating the tail and PDP values during
  context switching, map the corresponding page as uncached to avoid a
  race between CPU and GPU, both updating the same cacheline at the same
  time (Ville)

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 942069f..f6873a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1036,6 +1036,17 @@ static int intel_lr_context_do_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < BXT_REVID_B0) {
+		struct page *page;
+
+		drm_clflush_sg(ctx_obj->pages);
+		page = i915_gem_object_get_page(ctx_obj, LRC_STATE_PN);
+		ret = set_pages_uc(page, 1);
+		if (ret)
+			goto unpin_ctx_obj;
+	}
+
+
 	ret = intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj(ring->dev, ringbuf);
 	if (ret)
 		goto unpin_ctx_obj;
@@ -1076,12 +1087,21 @@ reset_pin_count:
 void intel_lr_context_unpin(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_engine_cs *ring = rq->ring;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = rq->i915;
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj = rq->ctx->engine[ring->id].state;
 	struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = rq->ringbuf;
 
 	if (ctx_obj) {
 		WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex));
 		if (--rq->ctx->engine[ring->id].pin_count == 0) {
+			if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) &&
+			    INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < BXT_REVID_B0) {
+				struct page *page;
+
+				page = i915_gem_object_get_page(ctx_obj,
+								LRC_STATE_PN);
+				WARN_ON_ONCE(set_pages_wb(page, 1));
+			}
 			intel_unpin_ringbuffer_obj(ringbuf);
 			i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx_obj);
 		}
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-17 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17 16:17 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/bxt: prevent allocating context object from HIGHMEM Imre Deak
2015-09-17 16:17 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2015-09-18  9:02   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/bxt: work around HW context corruption due to coherency problem Chris Wilson
2015-09-18 12:24     ` Imre Deak
2015-09-23 13:35     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 13:39       ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-23 13:57         ` Imre Deak
2015-09-23 14:17           ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-23 15:40             ` Imre Deak
2015-09-23 17:07               ` Imre Deak
2015-09-23 13:58         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 14:39           ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442506664-20159-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox