From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: driver based PASID handling
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 23:46:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444344368.92154.8.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5616538A.4000900@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1034 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 12:29 +0100, Tomas Elf wrote:
>
> Could someone clarify what this means from the TDR point of view,
> please? When you say "context blew up" I'm guessing that you mean that
> come context caused the fault handler to get involved somehow?
>
> Does this imply that the offending context will hang and the driver will
> have to detect this hang? If so, then yes - if we have the per-engine
> hang recovery mode as part of the upcoming TDR work in place then we
> could handle it by stepping over the offending batch buffer and moving
> on with a minimum of side-effects on the rest of the driver/GPU.
I don't think the context does hang.
I've made the page-request code artificially fail and report that it
was an invalid page fault. The gem_svm_fault test seems to complete
(albeit complaining that the test failed). Whereas if I just don't
service the page-request at all, *then* the GPU hang is detected.
I haven't actually looked at precisely what *is* happening.
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5691 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 16:58 [RFC] Page table sharing and bufferless execbuf Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: move mmu_find_ops to mmu_notifier.c Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] signal: export force_sig_info Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] android/sync: add sync_fence_create_dma Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] android/sync: hack: enable fence signaling in Android Native Sync implementation Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: add create_context2 ioctl Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: driver based PASID handling Jesse Barnes
2015-10-07 13:00 ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-07 15:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-07 16:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-10-07 17:17 ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-07 17:26 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-10-08 8:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-08 10:28 ` Tomas Elf
2015-10-08 11:29 ` Tomas Elf
2015-10-08 22:46 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2015-10-09 7:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-09 7:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-09 7:56 ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-09 8:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-09 9:07 ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-09 16:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-10-08 15:57 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-09 7:24 ` David Woodhouse
2015-09-04 16:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: add fences to the request struct Jesse Barnes
2015-10-09 13:29 ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-09 16:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Android sync points for i915 v4 (obsolete) Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 16:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: add bufferless execbuf ioctl Jesse Barnes
2015-09-04 17:37 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-04 19:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-10-08 10:34 ` David Woodhouse
2015-09-04 17:23 ` [RFC] Page table sharing and bufferless execbuf Chris Wilson
2015-09-04 19:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-09-26 14:55 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444344368.92154.8.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=tomas.elf@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox