From: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Thulasimani, Sivakumar" <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Avoid EBUSY retry on intel_dp_aux_ch.
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:55:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445457452.24860.115.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5627D30F.9020505@intel.com>
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 23:31 +0530, Thulasimani, Sivakumar wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2015 7:54 PM, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 12:19 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:28:51AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > EBUSY retries are already in place at drm level.
> > > > We don't need to replicate the job here.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 20 ++------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > index 09bdd94..d054129 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > @@ -818,24 +818,8 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > >
> > > > intel_aux_display_runtime_get(dev_priv);
> > > >
> > > > - /* Try to wait for any previous AUX channel activity
> > > > */
> > > > - for (try = 0; try < 3; try++) {
> > > > - status = I915_READ_NOTRACE(ch_ctl);
> > > > - if ((status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) == 0)
> > > > - break;
> > > > - msleep(1);
> > > The dp helper doesn't sleep at all between the retries, so
> > > dropping
> > > the
> > > sleep from here may change the behaviour.
> > hm indeed... what about
> > + msleep(1);
> > + ret = -EBUSY
> > + goto out;
> > ?
> the current code is one of few test cases that pass during compliance
> testing
> so please confirm this change does not break that :).
which one specifically are you telling about?
anyway basic tests here were at the same rate (128 pass/skip and 2
fails on bdw 1 fail on skl) without and with this series.
>
> regards,
> Sivakumar
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - if (try == 3) {
> > > > - static u32 last_status = -1;
> > > > - const u32 status = I915_READ(ch_ctl);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (status != last_status) {
> > > > - WARN(1, "dp_aux_ch not started status
> > > > 0x%08x\n",
> > > > - status);
> > > > - last_status = status;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > + status = I915_READ_NOTRACE(ch_ctl);
> > > > + if ((status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) != 0) {
> > > > ret = -EBUSY;
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-21 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 17:28 [PATCH 0/4] Organize aux retries Rodrigo Vivi
2015-10-21 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Avoid EBUSY retry on intel_dp_aux_ch Rodrigo Vivi
2015-10-21 9:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-21 14:24 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-10-21 18:01 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-21 19:55 ` Vivi, Rodrigo [this message]
2015-10-21 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Remove remaining retries from intel_dp_aux_ch Rodrigo Vivi
2015-10-21 17:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Fix random aux transactions failures Rodrigo Vivi
2015-10-21 7:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-21 7:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-21 18:17 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-21 19:57 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-10-21 17:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Kill intel_dp_dpcd_read_wake Rodrigo Vivi
2015-10-21 9:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-21 14:31 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2015-10-21 14:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445457452.24860.115.camel@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox