From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Grab one forcewake across the whole LRC irq handler
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:59:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447153185-5404-5-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447153185-5404-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
This is to replace multiple branch and spinlock heavy mmio
operations per LRC interrupt with a single forcewake grab.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 1f8566b1f072..2833ee642aa1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -301,7 +301,8 @@ uint64_t intel_lr_context_descriptor(struct intel_context *ctx,
}
static void execlists_elsp_write(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
- struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq1)
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq1,
+ bool fw_locked)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *ring = rq0->ring;
@@ -319,9 +320,12 @@ static void execlists_elsp_write(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
desc[0] = intel_lr_context_descriptor(rq0->ctx, rq0->ring);
rq0->elsp_submitted++;
+ if (!fw_locked) {
+ spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ }
+
/* You must always write both descriptors in the order below. */
- spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
- intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
I915_WRITE_FW(RING_ELSP(ring), upper_32_bits(desc[1]));
I915_WRITE_FW(RING_ELSP(ring), lower_32_bits(desc[1]));
@@ -331,8 +335,11 @@ static void execlists_elsp_write(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
/* ELSP is a wo register, use another nearby reg for posting */
POSTING_READ_FW(RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_LO(ring));
- intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
- spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+
+ if (!fw_locked) {
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+ }
}
static int execlists_update_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
@@ -372,17 +379,19 @@ static int execlists_update_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
}
static void execlists_submit_requests(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
- struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq1)
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq1,
+ bool fw_locked)
{
execlists_update_context(rq0);
if (rq1)
execlists_update_context(rq1);
- execlists_elsp_write(rq0, rq1);
+ execlists_elsp_write(rq0, rq1, fw_locked);
}
-static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+static void
+execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, bool fw_locked)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_request *req0 = NULL, *req1 = NULL;
struct drm_i915_gem_request *cursor = NULL, *tmp = NULL;
@@ -439,7 +448,7 @@ static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
WARN_ON(req1 && req1->elsp_submitted);
- execlists_submit_requests(req0, req1);
+ execlists_submit_requests(req0, req1, fw_locked);
}
static bool execlists_check_remove_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
@@ -487,19 +496,23 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
u32 status_id;
u32 submit_contexts = 0;
- status_pointer = I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(ring));
+ spin_lock(&ring->execlist_lock);
+
+ spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+
+ status_pointer = I915_READ_FW(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(ring));
read_pointer = ring->next_context_status_buffer;
write_pointer = status_pointer & GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK;
if (read_pointer > write_pointer)
write_pointer += GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES;
- spin_lock(&ring->execlist_lock);
while (read_pointer < write_pointer) {
read_pointer++;
- status = I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(ring, read_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES));
- status_id = I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_HI(ring, read_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES));
+ status = I915_READ_FW(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(ring, read_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES));
+ status_id = I915_READ_FW(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_HI(ring, read_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES));
if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE)
continue;
@@ -523,20 +536,23 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
/* Prevent a ctx to preempt itself */
if ((status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE) &&
(submit_contexts != 0))
- execlists_context_unqueue(ring);
+ execlists_context_unqueue(ring, true);
} else if (submit_contexts != 0) {
- execlists_context_unqueue(ring);
+ execlists_context_unqueue(ring, true);
}
- spin_unlock(&ring->execlist_lock);
-
WARN(submit_contexts > 2, "More than two context complete events?\n");
ring->next_context_status_buffer = write_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES;
- I915_WRITE(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(ring),
- _MASKED_FIELD(GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK << 8,
- ((u32)ring->next_context_status_buffer &
- GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK) << 8));
+ I915_WRITE_FW(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(ring),
+ _MASKED_FIELD(GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK << 8,
+ ((u32)ring->next_context_status_buffer &
+ GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK) << 8));
+
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+
+ spin_unlock(&ring->execlist_lock);
}
static int execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
@@ -574,7 +590,7 @@ static int execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
list_add_tail(&request->execlist_link, &ring->execlist_queue);
if (num_elements == 0)
- execlists_context_unqueue(ring);
+ execlists_context_unqueue(ring, false);
spin_unlock_irq(&ring->execlist_lock);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-10 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 10:59 [RFC 0/5] LRC irq handler cleanups Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-10 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Avoid invariant conditionals in lrc interrupt handler Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-10 10:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Move LRCA check out of the hot path Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-10 10:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Cache LRCA in the context Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-10 10:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-11-10 10:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Only grab and calculate timestamps when needed Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-11-10 11:36 ` [RFC 0/5] LRC irq handler cleanups Chris Wilson
2015-11-10 12:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447153185-5404-5-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox