public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device	suspended assert
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:23:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447424621.1480.6.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761162sef.fsf@intel.com>

On pe, 2015-11-13 at 10:52 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > This is v3 of [1]. I addressed the review comments from Ville and
> > Chris
> > and added an RPM atomic section check as well requested by Chris. I
> > was
> > also considering using lockdep for more coverage, but decided to
> > leave
> > that out for now, we can also add that later if needed.
> > 
> > The patchset depends on Patrik's DC rework patchset [2].
> 
> Uh-oh, so now we have a reviewed series, except it depends on a
> series
> that isn't ready, which has its own dependencies, and I've lost track
> of
> all the series in flight by now... Imre, I trust you to move the
> review
> of the dependencies forward, pinging people as necessary.

Yes, there are the two DC/DMC patchsets you mentioned that would need
to get merged before this one, they are being reviewed atm. There is no
functional dependency, I only want to avoid merge conflicts. For
reference and if someone wants to experiment with it there is the
following branch with all 3 patchsets:

https://github.com/ideak/linux/commits/rpm-assert-improvements

--Imre

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/0
> > 79777.html
> > [2]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/07975
> > 8.html
> > 
> > Imre Deak (7):
> >   drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert
> > helpers
> >   drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper
> >   drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it
> >   drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference
> >   drm/i915: sanitize the asserts in the RPM get/put helpers
> >   drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections
> >   drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE
> >     updaters
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c         |  7 ++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         | 39 +++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c     | 33 ++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         | 12 +++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h        | 67
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 24 +++++-------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     | 19 +++-------
> >  9 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.5.0
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-13 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 16:40 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:54   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:56   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:58   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-11-12 17:04   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 17:50     ` Imre Deak
2015-11-12 20:41       ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 20:49         ` Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:27           ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 23:03   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915: sanitize the asserts in the RPM get/put helpers Imre Deak
2015-11-12 23:06   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13 13:52   ` [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-11-13 14:08   ` [PATCH v4 " Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-11-12 23:09   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13  8:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Jani Nikula
2015-11-13 14:23   ` Imre Deak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1447424621.1480.6.camel@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox