From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:23:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447424621.1480.6.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761162sef.fsf@intel.com>
On pe, 2015-11-13 at 10:52 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > This is v3 of [1]. I addressed the review comments from Ville and
> > Chris
> > and added an RPM atomic section check as well requested by Chris. I
> > was
> > also considering using lockdep for more coverage, but decided to
> > leave
> > that out for now, we can also add that later if needed.
> >
> > The patchset depends on Patrik's DC rework patchset [2].
>
> Uh-oh, so now we have a reviewed series, except it depends on a
> series
> that isn't ready, which has its own dependencies, and I've lost track
> of
> all the series in flight by now... Imre, I trust you to move the
> review
> of the dependencies forward, pinging people as necessary.
Yes, there are the two DC/DMC patchsets you mentioned that would need
to get merged before this one, they are being reviewed atm. There is no
functional dependency, I only want to avoid merge conflicts. For
reference and if someone wants to experiment with it there is the
following branch with all 3 patchsets:
https://github.com/ideak/linux/commits/rpm-assert-improvements
--Imre
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>
> >
> > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/0
> > 79777.html
> > [2]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/07975
> > 8.html
> >
> > Imre Deak (7):
> > drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert
> > helpers
> > drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper
> > drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it
> > drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference
> > drm/i915: sanitize the asserts in the RPM get/put helpers
> > drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections
> > drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE
> > updaters
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 7 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 12 +++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 67
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 24 +++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 19 +++-------
> > 9 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 16:40 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:54 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:56 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:58 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-11-12 17:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 17:50 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-12 20:41 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 20:49 ` Imre Deak
2015-11-12 22:27 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 23:03 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915: sanitize the asserts in the RPM get/put helpers Imre Deak
2015-11-12 23:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-11-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v4 " Imre Deak
2015-11-12 16:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-11-12 23:09 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Jani Nikula
2015-11-13 14:23 ` Imre Deak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447424621.1480.6.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox