Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.

From: "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:24:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447932261.2913.40.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y4dub5nd.fsf@intel.com>

Em Qui, 2015-11-19 às 13:16 +0200, Jani Nikula escreveu:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > Em Qua, 2015-11-18 às 11:21 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > s/Cc/Reviewed-by/
> 
> I don't think our patchwork is quite smart enough for that yet, so
> for
> future reference, please be write the whole thing.

I completely forgot about this. Sorry.

I guess that also means that if I say "If you do this and this and
that, then I'll give you Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@inte
l.com> it will mark the patch as reviewed even though it needs rework,
right? I guess we just can't trust the PW automatic tag parsing since
it can have either false positives or false negatives. Not until some
major breakthroughs in AI.

Is suggesting deprecating the use of emails as a way to handle patches
still considered trolling?

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx