From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:18:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448029136.2773.27.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447741601-32700-1-git-send-email-shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 11:56 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
> This patch moves probing for panel, DPCD read etc to another
> function intel_dp_long_pulse, while intel_dp_detect returns
> the status as connected or disconnected depending on
> whether the edid is available or not.
May i suggest a slight rephrase?
"This patch moves probing for panel, DPCD read, etc done in intel_dp_detect() to
a new function: intel_dp_long_pulse(). Note that the behavior of
intel_dp_detect() is changed to report connected or disconnected depending on
whether the edid is available or not."
I think we also need a note why the EDID change is necessary and at the same
doesn't break anything.
> This change will be required by further patches in the series
> to avoid performing multiple DPCD operations and removing
> their duplication.
I found this last part confusing. Maybe replace "avoid multiple DPCD operations
and removing their duplication" with "avoid duplicated DPCD operations on
hotplug", since we are not going into details here.
>
> v2: Moved a hunk to next patch of the series.
> Moved intel_dp_unset_edid to out. (Ander)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> -
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 8071247..dd2b9da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4631,9 +4631,10 @@ intel_dp_power_put(struct intel_dp *dp,
> intel_display_power_put(to_i915(encoder->base.dev), power_domain);
> }
>
> -static enum drm_connector_status
> -intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +static void
> +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> {
> + struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> @@ -4643,17 +4644,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
> bool ret;
> u8 sink_irq_vector;
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> - connector->base.id, connector->name);
> - intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> -
> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> - /* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
> - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> - intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> - return connector_status_disconnected;
> - }
> -
> power_domain = intel_dp_power_get(intel_dp);
>
> /* Can't disconnect eDP, but you can close the lid... */
> @@ -4670,8 +4660,10 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
>
> ret = intel_dp_probe_mst(intel_dp);
> if (ret) {
> - /* if we are in MST mode then this connector
> - won't appear connected or have anything with EDID on it */
> + /*
> + * if we are in MST mode then this connector
> + * won't appear connected or have anything with EDID on it
> + */
> if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> status = connector_status_disconnected;
> @@ -4699,8 +4691,36 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
> }
>
> out:
> + if (status != connector_status_connected)
> + intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
I didn't notice this at first, but intel_dp_set_edid() doesn't free the previous
edid, so I think we also need to call it just before intel_dp_set_edid(). Patch
looks good otherwise.
Ander
> intel_dp_power_put(intel_dp, power_domain);
> - return status;
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +static enum drm_connector_status
> +intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +{
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector =
> to_intel_connector(connector);
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> + connector->base.id, connector->name);
> +
> + if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> + /* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
> + if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> + intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> + return connector_status_disconnected;
> + }
> +
> + intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> +
> + if (intel_connector->detect_edid)
> + return connector_status_connected;
> + else
> + return connector_status_disconnected;
> }
>
> static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-20 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-06 12:28 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-16 13:40 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 6:17 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-17 6:26 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-20 14:18 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2015-11-17 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 11:50 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-16 14:33 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-16 14:46 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 6:53 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-17 12:42 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 6:44 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-17 6:47 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-20 14:03 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: read sink_count dpcd always Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: force full detect on sink count change Shubhangi Shrivastava
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-15 10:07 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:24 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448029136.2773.27.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
--cc=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).