Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/igt_kms: Introduce get_first_connected_output macro

[Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 18:56 -0800, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> In some cases, we just need one valid (connected) output to perform
> a test. This macro can help in these situations by not having to
> put the test code inside a for loop that iterates over all the outputs.
> 
> v2: Added a brief documentation for this macro.
> 
> Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/igt_kms.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.h b/lib/igt_kms.h
> index 965c47c..a0bb066 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kms.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.h
> @@ -279,6 +279,18 @@ void igt_wait_for_vblank(int drm_fd, enum pipe pipe);
>  	for (int i__ = 0; (plane) = &(display)->pipes[(pipe)].planes[i__], \
>  		     i__ < (display)->pipes[(pipe)].n_planes; i__++)
>  
> +/**
> + * get_first_connected_output:
> + * @display: Initialized igt_display_t type object
> + * @output: igt_output_t type object
> + *
> + * Returns: First valid (connected) output.
> + */
> +#define get_first_connected_output(display, output)		\
> +	for (int i__ = 0;  i__ < (display)->n_outputs; i__++)	\
> +		if ((output = &(display)->outputs[i__]), output->valid) \
> +			break
> +

Is it possible that there is no valid output?

Ander
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx