From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:55:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450220141.16653.7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215205731.GT4437@intel.com>
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 22:57 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > All platforms with power well support have runtime PM support, so
> > simplify things by explicitly disabling power well support on
> > platforms
> > without runtime PM support. This results in holding the init power
> > domain
> > reference whenever the driver is loaded in addition to an RPM
> > reference,
> > which reflects the reality better and makes it possible to simplify
> > things by removing the HAS_RUNTIME_PM special casing from more
> > places in
> > a follow-up patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 9945040..f4ff5f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -1908,6 +1908,11 @@ static int
> > sanitize_disable_power_well_option(const struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > int disable_power_well)
> > {
> > + if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv)) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No runtime PM support, disabling
> > display power well support\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> Feels a bit too magic to me. Needs a comment at least, otherwise
> someone
> is going to change disable_power_well back into something you can
> disable
> at runtime and then all the old stuff might break.
>
> Grabbing an extra rpm reference explicitly for this purpose might be
> less confusing.
Ok, agreed. But making power well support depend on RPM still ok with
you? I can add then the extra RPM get/put only for !HAS_RUNTIME_PM.
>
> > +
> > if (disable_power_well >= 0)
> > return !!disable_power_well;
> >
> > --
> > 2.5.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:10 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: clarify comment about mandatory RPM put/get during driver load/unload Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support Imre Deak
2015-12-15 20:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-15 22:55 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2015-12-16 11:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 13:21 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:13 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: refactor RPM disabling due to RC6 being disabled Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:54 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:56 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:49 ` [PATCH 4.1/10] drm/i915: get a permanent RPM reference on platforms w/o RPM support Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:22 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:44 ` [PATCH v3.1/10] " Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-17 12:46 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-12-16 12:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:54 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 13:39 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:43 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-12-15 21:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 22:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 0:14 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 0:52 ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:00 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:49 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:06 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 22:53 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-12-17 14:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450220141.16653.7.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).