From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:56:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450263411.4707.13.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450203038-5150-5-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
On ti, 2015-12-15 at 20:10 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> We don't really need to check this flag in the get/put/assert
> helpers,
> as on platforms without RPM support we won't ever enable RPM. That
> means
> pm.suspend will be always false and the assert will be always true.
>
> Do this to simplify the code and to let us extend the RPM asserts to
> all
> platforms for a better coverage.
>
> Motivated by Ville.
>
> v2-v3:
> - unchanged
> v4:
> - remove the HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from intel_runtime_pm_enable() too
> made possible by the previous two patches
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v3)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 12 ------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 342baa9..bca7ca7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -2237,9 +2237,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>
> - if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> - return;
> -
> pm_runtime_get_sync(device);
> WARN(dev_priv->pm.suspended, "Device still suspended.\n");
> }
> @@ -2266,9 +2263,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>
> - if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> - return;
> -
> WARN(dev_priv->pm.suspended, "Getting nosync-ref while
> suspended.\n");
> pm_runtime_get_noresume(device);
> }
> @@ -2286,9 +2280,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>
> - if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> - return;
> -
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(device);
> }
> @@ -2308,9 +2299,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>
> - if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> - return;
> -
> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(device, 10000); /* 10s */
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);
> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(device);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index fcf04fe..0226776 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(const enum
> forcewake_domain_id id)
> static void
> assert_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - WARN_ONCE(HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev) && dev_priv
> ->pm.suspended,
> - "Device suspended\n");
> + WARN_ONCE(dev_priv->pm.suspended, "Device suspended\n");
> }
>
> static inline void
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:10 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: clarify comment about mandatory RPM put/get during driver load/unload Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support Imre Deak
2015-12-15 20:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-15 22:55 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 13:21 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:13 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: refactor RPM disabling due to RC6 being disabled Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:54 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:56 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2015-12-16 13:49 ` [PATCH 4.1/10] drm/i915: get a permanent RPM reference on platforms w/o RPM support Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:22 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:44 ` [PATCH v3.1/10] " Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-17 12:46 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-12-16 12:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:54 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 13:39 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:43 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-12-15 21:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 22:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 0:14 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 0:52 ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:00 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:49 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:06 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 22:53 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-12-17 14:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450263411.4707.13.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).