From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450273183.4707.19.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151216130258.GP6851@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On ke, 2015-12-16 at 13:02 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:54:43PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On ke, 2015-12-16 at 12:11 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:33PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > +static inline void
> > > > +assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private
> > > > *dev_priv)
> > > > +{
> > > > + WARN_ONCE(dev_priv->pm.suspended,
> > > > + "Device suspended during HW access\n");
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > On irc, Joonas expressed a wish to see all errors during an igt
> > > run,
> > > i.e. something like
> > >
> > > static inline void
> > > assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private
> > > *dev_priv)
> > > {
> > > WARN(dev_priv->pm.suspended &&
> > > atomic_inc_return(&dev_priv->pm.errors) < 0,
> > > "Device suspended during HW access\n");
> > > }
> [snip]
>
> > Sounds good, we could use this also for other PM related error
> > reporting.
> >
> > Are you ok to do this as a follow-up?
>
> Definitely. We haven't changed any behaviour so far, so this is a new
> feature.
I'd prefer to currently add it as WARN instead of WARN_ONCE, and then
reduce the message amount with follow-up. This way we'll get more
useful CI results immediately.
Regards, Joonas
> -Chris
>
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:10 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: clarify comment about mandatory RPM put/get during driver load/unload Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support Imre Deak
2015-12-15 20:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-15 22:55 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 13:21 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:13 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: refactor RPM disabling due to RC6 being disabled Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:54 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:56 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:49 ` [PATCH 4.1/10] drm/i915: get a permanent RPM reference on platforms w/o RPM support Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:22 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:44 ` [PATCH v3.1/10] " Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-17 12:46 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-12-16 12:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:54 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 13:39 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2015-12-16 13:43 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-12-15 21:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 22:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 0:14 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 0:52 ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:00 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:49 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:06 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 22:53 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-12-17 14:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450273183.4707.19.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).