From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:20:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452684041.2628.15.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451998226-21433-2-git-send-email-shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 18:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
> intel_dp_detect() is called for not just detection but
> during modes enumeration as well. Repeating the whole
> sequence during each of these calls is wasteful and
> time consuming.
> This patch moves probing for panel, DPCD read etc done in
> intel_dp_detect() to a new function intel_dp_long_pulse().
> Note that the behavior of intel_dp_detect() is changed to
> report connected or disconnected depending on whether the
> EDID is available or not.
> This change will be required by further patches in the series
> to avoid performing duplicated DPCD operations on hotplug.
>
> v2: Moved a hunk to next patch of the series.
> Moved intel_dp_unset_edid to out. (Ander)
> v3: Rephrased commit message and intel_dp_unset_dp() is called
> within intel_dp_set_dp() to free the previous EDID. (Ander)
>
> Tested-by: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> -
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 796e3d3..e3b4208 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> bool sync);
> static void vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> enum pipe pipe);
> +static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>
> static unsigned int intel_dp_unused_lane_mask(int lane_count)
> {
> @@ -4587,6 +4588,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp
> ->attached_connector;
> struct edid *edid;
>
> + intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> edid = intel_dp_get_edid(intel_dp);
> intel_connector->detect_edid = edid;
>
> @@ -4607,9 +4609,10 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->has_audio = false;
> }
>
> -static enum drm_connector_status
> -intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +static void
> +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> {
> + struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> @@ -4619,17 +4622,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
> bool ret;
> u8 sink_irq_vector;
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> - connector->base.id, connector->name);
> - intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> -
> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> - /* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
> - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> - intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> - return connector_status_disconnected;
> - }
> -
> power_domain = intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
> intel_display_power_get(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
>
> @@ -4653,14 +4645,8 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
> intel_dp_probe_oui(intel_dp);
>
> ret = intel_dp_probe_mst(intel_dp);
> - if (ret) {
> - /* if we are in MST mode then this connector
> - won't appear connected or have anything with EDID on it */
> - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> - intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
This deletion is new in this version of the patch. I think we still need the
hunk above, otherwise we might not properly update the encoder type when we
switch from an HDMI sink connected through a level shifter to an MST sink.
Ander
> - status = connector_status_disconnected;
> + if (ret)
> goto out;
> - }
>
> /*
> * Clearing NACK and defer counts to get their exact values
> @@ -4691,8 +4677,36 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
> }
>
> out:
> + if (status != connector_status_connected)
> + intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
> - return status;
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +static enum drm_connector_status
> +intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +{
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector =
> to_intel_connector(connector);
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> + connector->base.id, connector->name);
> +
> + if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> + /* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
> + if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> + intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> + return connector_status_disconnected;
> + }
> +
> + intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> +
> + if (intel_connector->detect_edid)
> + return connector_status_connected;
> + else
> + return connector_status_disconnected;
> }
>
> static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 12:50 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 11:20 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2016-01-13 13:33 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-14 13:50 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-15 10:07 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:24 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 14:05 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 15:04 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:52 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 21:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-01-19 4:44 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 8:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19 8:59 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 9:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19 9:11 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 9:55 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorganizing intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:00 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:56 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: read sink_count dpcd always Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:04 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 12:44 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:46 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:49 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:36 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: force full detect on sink count change Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:50 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:40 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 13:49 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2016-01-18 10:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev6) Patchwork
2016-01-18 11:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev7) Patchwork
2016-01-18 13:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev8) Patchwork
2016-01-19 9:38 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 10:22 ` Shrivastava, Shubhangi
2016-01-19 10:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev9) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-06 12:28 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-16 13:40 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 6:17 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-17 9:22 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 11:50 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 12:55 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 13:05 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452684041.2628.15.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).