intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:11:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453281080.2594.19.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453199833-10401-1-git-send-email-shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>

On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 16:07 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
> intel_dp_detect() is called for not just detection but
> during modes enumeration as well. Repeating the whole
> sequence during each of these calls is wasteful and
> time consuming.
> This patch moves probing for panel, DPCD read etc done in
> intel_dp_detect() to a new function intel_dp_long_pulse().
> Note that the behavior of intel_dp_detect() is changed to
> report connected or disconnected depending on whether the
> EDID is available or not.
> This change will be required by further patches in the series
> to avoid performing duplicated DPCD operations on hotplug.
> 
> v2: Moved a hunk to next patch of the series.
>     Moved intel_dp_unset_edid to out. (Ander)
> v3: Rephrased commit message and intel_dp_unset_dp() is called
>     within intel_dp_set_dp() to free the previous EDID. (Ander)
> 
> Tested-by: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> -
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 1761254..8969ff9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> bool sync);
>  static void vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  				      enum pipe pipe);
> +static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  static unsigned int intel_dp_unused_lane_mask(int lane_count)
>  {
> @@ -4577,6 +4578,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp
> ->attached_connector;
>  	struct edid *edid;
>  
> +	intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>  	edid = intel_dp_get_edid(intel_dp);
>  	intel_connector->detect_edid = edid;
>  
> @@ -4597,9 +4599,10 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	intel_dp->has_audio = false;
>  }
>  
> -static enum drm_connector_status
> -intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +static void
> +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>  {
> +	struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>  	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> @@ -4609,17 +4612,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
>  	bool ret;
>  	u8 sink_irq_vector;
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> -		      connector->base.id, connector->name);
> -	intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> -
> -	if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> -		/* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
> -		if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> -			intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> -		return connector_status_disconnected;
> -	}
> -
>  	power_domain = intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
>  	intel_display_power_get(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
>  
> @@ -4640,17 +4632,14 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> +		intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> +
>  	intel_dp_probe_oui(intel_dp);
>  
>  	ret = intel_dp_probe_mst(intel_dp);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		/* if we are in MST mode then this connector
> -		   won't appear connected or have anything with EDID on it */
> -		if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> -			intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> -		status = connector_status_disconnected;
> +	if (ret)
>  		goto out;

There is still the removal of "status = connector_status_disconnected;", so when
we goto to out, status is still connected and we don't call
intel_dp_unset_edid(), which will cause the return value of intel_dp_detect() to
be somewhat random. With that fixed, this is 

Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>


Ander

> -	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clearing NACK and defer counts to get their exact values
> @@ -4662,8 +4651,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
>  
>  	intel_dp_set_edid(intel_dp);
>  
> -	if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> -		intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>  	status = connector_status_connected;
>  
>  	/* Try to read the source of the interrupt */
> @@ -4681,8 +4668,37 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
> force)
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> +	if (status != connector_status_connected)
> +		intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>  	intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
> -	return status;
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +static enum drm_connector_status
> +intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> +{
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector =
> to_intel_connector(connector);
> +
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> +		     connector->base.id, connector->name);
> +
> +	if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> +		/* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
> +		intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> +		if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> +			intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
> +		return connector_status_disconnected;
> +	}
> +
> +	intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> +
> +	if (intel_connector->detect_edid)
> +		return connector_status_connected;
> +	else
> +		return connector_status_disconnected;
>  }
>  
>  static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-19 10:37 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-20  9:23   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-26 13:22   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-29  9:01     ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-29 12:03       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-02-01  6:20         ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-02-01  9:13           ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-11-17 22:01             ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-18  9:41               ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-11-18  9:51                 ` Chris Wilson
2016-01-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Reorganizing intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-20  9:46   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and read sink_count dpcd always Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-20 14:31   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: force full detect on sink count change Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-20 14:36   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-03-24 12:21     ` Shrivastava, Shubhangi
2016-03-30 11:09       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-03-31 13:31         ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 11:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Patchwork
2016-01-20  9:11 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-30 12:35 [PATCH 1/5] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-02-16 11:52 Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-02-10  9:04 Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-02-01 11:42 Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 10:20 Shubhangi Shrivastava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453281080.2594.19.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).