From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] drm/i915: two small moves towards more consistency
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:33:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454697228-33164-9-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454697228-33164-1-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com>
From: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Rename i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer() to i915_gem_cleanup_engines(),
to relect what it actually does (clean up all the engines, not a
single ringbuffer). The name is probably a legacy from the days
when there was only one "ring" (i.e. engine) and one ringbuffer!
While we're looking at this function, there's a strangely-formatted
comment block that looks ugly, so let's prettify it.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
index a42eb58..5d95c80 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
cleanup_gem:
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
+ i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
i915_gem_context_fini(dev);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
cleanup_irq:
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
intel_guc_ucode_fini(dev);
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
+ i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
i915_gem_context_fini(dev);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 8216665..e11eef1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3058,7 +3058,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev);
int __must_check i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev);
int i915_gem_l3_remap(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, int slice);
void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_device *dev);
-void i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(struct drm_device *dev);
+void i915_gem_cleanup_engines(struct drm_device *dev);
int __must_check i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
int __must_check i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 2bd5b5f..c85029b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4913,7 +4913,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
req = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(req)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(req);
- i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
+ i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
goto out;
}
@@ -4926,7 +4926,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
if (ret && ret != -EIO) {
DRM_ERROR("PPGTT enable ring #%d failed %d\n", i, ret);
i915_gem_request_cancel(req);
- i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
+ i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
goto out;
}
@@ -4934,7 +4934,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
if (ret && ret != -EIO) {
DRM_ERROR("Context enable ring #%d failed %d\n", i, ret);
i915_gem_request_cancel(req);
- i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(dev);
+ i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
goto out;
}
@@ -5012,7 +5012,7 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
}
void
-i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(struct drm_device *dev)
+i915_gem_cleanup_engines(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
@@ -5021,13 +5021,14 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring(ring);
- if (i915.enable_execlists)
- /*
- * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
- * expects the system to be in execlists mode on startup,
- * so we need to reset the GPU back to legacy mode.
- */
- intel_gpu_reset(dev);
+ if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+ /*
+ * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
+ * expects the system to be in execlists mode on startup,
+ * so we need to reset the GPU back to legacy mode.
+ */
+ intel_gpu_reset(dev);
+ }
}
static void
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-05 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-05 18:33 [PATCH v5 00/11] A collection of cleanups, revisited Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] drm/i915: unmap the correct page in intel_logical_ring_cleanup() Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] drm/i915: consolidate LRC mode HWSP setup & teardown Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] drm/i915: remove useless copypasted code Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] drm/i915: tidy up initialisation failure paths (GEM) Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] drm/i915: tidy initialisation failure paths (legacy, part 1) Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] drm/i915: tidy initialisation failure paths (legacy, part 2) Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] drm/i915: tidy initialisation failure paths (legacy, part 3) Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] drm/i915: tear down hardware status page mappings earlier Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] drm/i915: interchange context/engine cleanup order Dave Gordon
2016-02-05 18:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] drm/i915: make LRC status page teardown code a bit more robust Dave Gordon
2016-02-08 12:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for A collection of cleanups, revisited Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454697228-33164-9-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).