From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Check for get_pages instead of shmem (filp)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:48:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454723317-31605-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
This behavior of checking for a shmem backed GEM object was introduced here:
commit 4c914c0c7c787b8f730128a8cdcca9c50b0784ab
Author: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Date: Tue Feb 18 10:15:45 2014 -0800
drm/i915: Refactor shmem pread setup
It is possible for an object to not be a shmem backed GEM object (for example
userptr objects). An example of how we hit this failure can be found through
copy_batch() in the command parser because we allocate a userptr object for the
batch which contains privileged instructions. Userptr calls
drm_gem_private_object_init() which explicitly sets the filp to none.
It is equally feasible to simply remove the check altogether. You'll probably
oops with get_pages somewhere, but that's okay IMO because this condition
should be a driver bug, and not trigger-able by userspace. On this note, the
function name could probably benefit from a change, but whatever.
NOTE: I manually retyped this from a test machine. So I haven't even compiled
this exact patch.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 66b1705..a198928 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ int i915_gem_obj_prepare_shmem_read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
*needs_clflush = 0;
- if (!obj->base.filp)
+ if (!obj->ops->get_pages)
return -EINVAL;
if (!(obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)) {
--
2.7.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-06 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-06 1:48 Ben Widawsky [this message]
2016-02-08 12:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Check for get_pages instead of shmem (filp) Patchwork
2016-02-08 23:02 ` [PATCH] " Jordan Justen
2016-02-09 0:20 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2016-02-09 11:30 ` Dave Gordon
2016-02-09 17:37 ` Ben Widawsky
2016-02-09 19:44 ` [PATCH] [v2] " Ben Widawsky
2016-02-10 15:42 ` Ben Widawsky
2016-02-10 16:23 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-10 17:39 ` Ben Widawsky
2016-02-15 17:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-02-15 17:56 ` Dave Gordon
2016-02-10 7:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Check for get_pages instead of shmem (filp) (rev2) Patchwork
2016-02-15 17:25 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454723317-31605-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--to=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).