From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: GEM operations need to be done under the big lock
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:27:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455186452-13691-3-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455186452-13691-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
VMA creation and GEM list management need the big lock.
v2:
Mutex unlock ended on the wrong path somehow. (0-day, Julia Lawall)
Not to mention drm_gem_object_unreference was there in existing
code with no mutex held.
v3:
Some callers of i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated
already hold the lock so move the mutex into the other caller
as well.
v4:
Changed to lockdep_assert_held. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index ba1a00d815d3..feec0f80d8ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -638,6 +638,8 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!drm_mm_initialized(&dev_priv->mm.stolen))
return NULL;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("creating preallocated stolen object: stolen_offset=%x, gtt_offset=%x, size=%x\n",
stolen_offset, gtt_offset, size);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 836bbdc239b6..57e465ed088b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -2551,12 +2551,16 @@ intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
if (size_aligned * 2 > dev_priv->gtt.stolen_usable_size)
return false;
+ mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(dev,
base_aligned,
base_aligned,
size_aligned);
- if (!obj)
+ if (!obj) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
return false;
+ }
obj->tiling_mode = plane_config->tiling;
if (obj->tiling_mode == I915_TILING_X)
@@ -2569,12 +2573,12 @@ intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
mode_cmd.modifier[0] = fb->modifier[0];
mode_cmd.flags = DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS;
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (intel_framebuffer_init(dev, to_intel_framebuffer(fb),
&mode_cmd, obj)) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("intel fb init failed\n");
goto out_unref_obj;
}
+
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("initial plane fb obj %p\n", obj);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 10:27 [PATCH 0/5] Assorted reviewed patches for CI run Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-11 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Use appropriate spinlock flavour Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-11 10:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-02-11 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Fix struct mutex vs. RPS lock inversion Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-11 10:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/guc: Do not wait for firmware load atomically Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-11 10:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/ilk: Move register read under spinlock Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-15 14:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Assorted reviewed patches for CI run Patchwork
2016-02-15 16:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455186452-13691-3-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).