From: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v4 0/3] Unify slow/combinatorial test handling
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:09:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455188974-17801-1-git-send-email-david.weinehall@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Until now we've had no unified way to handle slow/combinatorial tests.
Most of the time we don't want to run slow/combinatorial tests, so this
should remain the default, but when we do want to run such tests,
it has been handled differently in different tests.
This patch adds an --all command line option to igt_core, changes
gem_concurrent_blit and kms_frontbuffer_tracking to use this instead of
their own methods, and removes gem_concurrent_all in the process, since
it's now unnecessary.
Test cases that have subtests that should not be run by default should
use the igt_subtest_flags() / ugt_subtest_flags_f() functions and
pass the subtest types as part of the flags parameter.
v2: Incorporate various suggestions from reviewers.
v3: Rewrite to provide a generic mechanism for categorising
the subtests
v4: Refreshed against a more recent version of i-g-t
David Weinehall (3):
Copy gem_concurrent_all to gem_concurrent_blit
Unify handling of slow/combinatorial tests
Remove superfluous gem_concurrent_all.c
David Weinehall (3):
tests/gem_concurrent_blit: rename gem_concurrent_all
lib/igt_core: Unify handling of slow/combinatorial tests
tests/gem_concurrent_all: Remove gem_concurrent_all.c
lib/igt_core.c | 43 +-
lib/igt_core.h | 42 ++
tests/Makefile.sources | 1 -
tests/gem_concurrent_all.c | 1540 -------------------------------------
tests/gem_concurrent_blit.c | 1548 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 186 +++--
6 files changed, 1725 insertions(+), 1635 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tests/gem_concurrent_all.c
--
2.7.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 11:09 David Weinehall [this message]
2016-02-11 11:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 1/3] tests/gem_concurrent_blit: rename gem_concurrent_all David Weinehall
2016-02-11 11:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 2/3] lib/igt_core: Unify handling of slow/combinatorial tests David Weinehall
2016-02-11 13:04 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-11 13:40 ` David Weinehall
2016-02-16 15:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-02-18 8:42 ` David Weinehall
2016-02-11 11:09 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 3/3] tests/gem_concurrent_all: Remove gem_concurrent_all.c David Weinehall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455188974-17801-1-git-send-email-david.weinehall@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.weinehall@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).