public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Add wait_for_us
Date: Thu,  3 Mar 2016 14:36:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457015805-23742-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

This is for callers who want micro-second precision but are not
waiting from the atomic context.

v2:
  * Fix atomic waits. (Dave Gordon)
  * Use USEC_PER_SEC and USEC_PER_MSEC. (Chris Wilson)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 15 ++++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index f272b3541e00..3629e293ff61 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1779,11 +1779,11 @@ static void wait_panel_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 			I915_READ(pp_stat_reg),
 			I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));
 
-	if (_wait_for((I915_READ(pp_stat_reg) & mask) == value, 5000, 10)) {
+	if (_wait_for((I915_READ(pp_stat_reg) & mask) == value,
+		      5 * USEC_PER_SEC, 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC))
 		DRM_ERROR("Panel status timeout: status %08x control %08x\n",
 				I915_READ(pp_stat_reg),
 				I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));
-	}
 
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Wait complete\n");
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 6c0085496fca..c2a62e9554b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@
  * having timed out, since the timeout could be due to preemption or similar and
  * we've never had a chance to check the condition before the timeout.
  */
-#define _wait_for(COND, MS, W) ({ \
-	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MS) + 1;	\
+#define _wait_for(COND, US, W) ({ \
+	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US) + 1;	\
 	int ret__ = 0;							\
 	while (!(COND)) {						\
 		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout__)) {			\
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 			break;						\
 		}							\
 		if ((W) && drm_can_sleep()) {				\
-			usleep_range((W)*1000, (W)*2000);		\
+			usleep_range((W), (W)*2);			\
 		} else {						\
 			cpu_relax();					\
 		}							\
@@ -63,10 +63,11 @@
 	ret__;								\
 })
 
-#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 1)
-#define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 0)
-#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) _wait_for((COND), \
-					       DIV_ROUND_UP((US), 1000), 0)
+#define wait_for(COND, MS)	  	_wait_for((COND), (MS) * 1000, 1000)
+#define wait_for_us(COND, US)	  	_wait_for((COND), (US), 1)
+
+#define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) 	_wait_for((COND), (MS) * 1000, 0)
+#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US)	_wait_for((COND), (US), 0)
 
 #define KHz(x) (1000 * (x))
 #define MHz(x) KHz(1000 * (x))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 0b42ada338c8..b1413beb00d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -507,7 +507,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 
 		/* Wait till PSR is idle */
 		if (_wait_for((I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL) &
-			       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0, 2000, 10))
+			       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0,
+			       2 * USEC_PER_SEC, 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC))
 			DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");
 
 		dev_priv->psr.active = false;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-03 14:36 Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-03-03 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/lrc: Do not wait atomically when stopping engines Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Kconfig for extra driver debugging Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic wait granularity Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 15:11   ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-03 15:43     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 16:10       ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-03 16:21         ` [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 14:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Do not wait atomically for display clocks Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 15:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Add wait_for_us Patchwork
2016-03-03 17:01   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 17:20     ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-03 17:35       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-03 17:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Add wait_for_us (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1457015805-23742-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox