From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lyude Paul Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Call intel_dp_mst_resume() before resuming displays Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:49:53 -0400 Message-ID: <1458164993.5551.1.camel@redhat.com> References: <1457711822-20335-1-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com> <1457711822-20335-2-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com> <20160313184526.GL14170@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160313184526.GL14170@phenom.ffwll.local> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , stable@vger.kernel.org, "open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow..., linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org open list" , Daniel Vetter List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:45 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:57:01AM -0500, Lyude wrote: > >=20 > > Since we need MST devices ready before we try to resume displays, > > calling this after intel_display_resume() can result in some issues= with > > various laptop docks where the monitor won't turn back on after > > suspending the system. > >=20 > > This order was originally changed in > >=20 > > commit e7d6f7d70829 ("drm/i915: resume MST after reading back hw s= tate") > >=20 > > In order to fix some unclaimed register errors, however the actual = cause > > of those has since been fixed. > >=20 > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > Don't we need to first apply patch 2/2 to avoid breaking systems > in-between? > -Daniel AFAICT the warns don't appear even with this patch, so no. >=20 > >=20 > > --- > > =C2=A0drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 ++-- > > =C2=A01 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > index f357058..08854ae 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > @@ -761,12 +761,12 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device = *dev) > > =C2=A0 dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev); > > =C2=A0 spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock); > > =C2=A0 > > + intel_dp_mst_resume(dev); > > + > > =C2=A0 drm_modeset_lock_all(dev); > > =C2=A0 intel_display_resume(dev); > > =C2=A0 drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); > > =C2=A0 > > - intel_dp_mst_resume(dev); > > - > > =C2=A0 /* > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0* ... but also need to make sure that hotplug processi= ng > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0* doesn't cause havoc. Like in the driver load code we= don't > > --=C2=A0 > > 2.5.0 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx