public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel
Date: Fri,  8 Apr 2016 14:54:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460123698-16832-2-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460123698-16832-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

If we move the release of the GEM request (i.e. decoupling it from the
various lists used for client and context tracking) after it is complete
(either by the GPU retiring the request, or by the caller cancelling the
request), we can remove the requirement that the final unreference of
the GEM request need to be under the struct_mutex.

v2: Execlists as always is badly asymetric and year old patches still
haven't landed to fix it up.

v3: Extracted, rebased and fixed for GuC. (Tvrtko Ursulin)

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      | 14 ----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c      | 50 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index da403f4fc679..fa199b7e51b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2352,23 +2352,9 @@ i915_gem_request_reference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
 static inline void
 i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
 {
-	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&req->engine->dev->struct_mutex));
 	kref_put(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free);
 }
 
-static inline void
-i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
-{
-	struct drm_device *dev;
-
-	if (!req)
-		return;
-
-	dev = req->engine->dev;
-	if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
-		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-}
-
 static inline void i915_gem_request_assign(struct drm_i915_gem_request **pdst,
 					   struct drm_i915_gem_request *src)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 239452933a89..c1df696f9002 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1410,10 +1410,31 @@ i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
 	request->pid = NULL;
 }
 
+static void __i915_gem_request_release(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
+{
+	if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+		if (request->ctx != request->i915->kernel_context)
+			intel_lr_context_unpin(request->ctx, request->engine);
+	}
+
+	i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(request);
+
+	i915_gem_context_unreference(request->ctx);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(request);
+}
+
+void i915_gem_request_cancel(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
+{
+	intel_ring_reserved_space_cancel(req->ringbuf);
+	__i915_gem_request_release(req);
+}
+
 static void i915_gem_request_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
 {
 	trace_i915_gem_request_retire(request);
 
+	list_del_init(&request->list);
+
 	/* We know the GPU must have read the request to have
 	 * sent us the seqno + interrupt, so use the position
 	 * of tail of the request to update the last known position
@@ -1424,10 +1445,7 @@ static void i915_gem_request_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
 	 */
 	request->ringbuf->last_retired_head = request->postfix;
 
-	list_del_init(&request->list);
-	i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(request);
-
-	i915_gem_request_unreference(request);
+	__i915_gem_request_release(request);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -2723,18 +2741,7 @@ static void i915_set_reset_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 void i915_gem_request_free(struct kref *req_ref)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_request *req = container_of(req_ref,
-						 typeof(*req), ref);
-	struct intel_context *ctx = req->ctx;
-
-	if (req->file_priv)
-		i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(req);
-
-	if (ctx) {
-		if (i915.enable_execlists && ctx != req->i915->kernel_context)
-			intel_lr_context_unpin(ctx, req->engine);
-
-		i915_gem_context_unreference(ctx);
-	}
+							typeof(*req), ref);
 
 	kmem_cache_free(req->i915->requests, req);
 }
@@ -2830,13 +2837,6 @@ i915_gem_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : req;
 }
 
-void i915_gem_request_cancel(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
-{
-	intel_ring_reserved_space_cancel(req->ringbuf);
-
-	i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
-}
-
 struct drm_i915_gem_request *
 i915_gem_find_active_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
@@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 			ret = __i915_wait_request(req[i], reset_counter, true,
 						  args->timeout_ns > 0 ? &args->timeout_ns : NULL,
 						  to_rps_client(file));
-		i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(req[i]);
+		i915_gem_request_unreference(req[i]);
 	}
 	return ret;
 
@@ -4216,7 +4216,7 @@ i915_gem_ring_throttle(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
 	if (ret == 0)
 		queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->mm.retire_work, 0);
 
-	i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(target);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(target);
 
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index feb7028341b8..f2ce7310e2b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -11362,7 +11362,7 @@ static void intel_mmio_flip_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
 					    mmio_flip->crtc->reset_counter,
 					    false, NULL,
 					    &mmio_flip->i915->rps.mmioflips));
-		i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(mmio_flip->req);
+		i915_gem_request_unreference(mmio_flip->req);
 	}
 
 	/* For framebuffer backed by dmabuf, wait for fence */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 43b24a1f5ee6..346e353b4fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -7378,7 +7378,7 @@ static void __intel_rps_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		gen6_rps_boost(to_i915(req->engine->dev), NULL,
 			       req->emitted_jiffies);
 
-	i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(req);
+	i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
 	kfree(boost);
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-08 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-08 13:54 [RFC 0/4] Eliminating the execlist retired request queue Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-04-08 15:01   ` [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel Chris Wilson
2016-04-11  9:19     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 2/4] drm/i915/guc: Keep the previous context pinned until the next one has been completed Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:37   ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11  8:58     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 3/4] drm/i915: Use new i915_gem_object_pin_map for LRC Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:40   ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11  9:05     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11  9:18       ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Stop tracking execlists retired requests Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:57   ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11  9:10     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11  9:23       ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11  9:26       ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-08 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Eliminating the execlist retired request queue Patchwork
2016-04-09  8:03 ` [RFC 0/4] " Chris Wilson
2016-04-11  9:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11 10:20     ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460123698-16832-2-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox