public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT
@ 2016-04-26  9:08 Matthew Auld
  2016-04-26  9:31 ` Chris Wilson
  2016-04-26  9:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2016-04-26  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

If we are not in FULL_48BIT_PPGTT mode then we really shouldn't
continue on with our allocations, given that the call to free_pdp would
bail early without freeing everything, thus leaking memory.

v2:
(Joonas Lahtinen)
  - tidy up with goto teardown path
v3:
(Joonas Lahtinen)
  - use more appropriate goto label name

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 0d666b3..3ace3d0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -567,13 +567,16 @@ static struct
 i915_page_directory_pointer *alloc_pdp(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct i915_page_directory_pointer *pdp;
-	int ret = -ENOMEM;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON(!USES_FULL_48BIT_PPGTT(dev));
+	if (WARN_ON(!USES_FULL_48BIT_PPGTT(dev)))
+		goto fail;
 
 	pdp = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdp), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pdp)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	if (!pdp) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto fail;
+	}
 
 	ret = __pdp_init(dev, pdp);
 	if (ret)
@@ -589,7 +592,7 @@ fail_page_m:
 	__pdp_fini(pdp);
 fail_bitmap:
 	kfree(pdp);
-
+fail:
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
-- 
2.4.11

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT
  2016-04-26  9:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT Matthew Auld
@ 2016-04-26  9:31 ` Chris Wilson
  2016-04-26  9:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2016-04-26  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> If we are not in FULL_48BIT_PPGTT mode then we really shouldn't
> continue on with our allocations, given that the call to free_pdp would
> bail early without freeing everything, thus leaking memory.

Why? Why are you second guessing the caller who asked for a
i915_page_directory struct to be allocated? Is there any reason for a
warn here?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT
  2016-04-26  9:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT Matthew Auld
  2016-04-26  9:31 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2016-04-26  9:55 ` Patchwork
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-04-26  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/6312/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Series 6312v1 drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/6312/revisions/1/mbox/

Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
                pass       -> FAIL       (hsw-gt2)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (bdw-nuci7)

bdw-nuci7        total:200  pass:188  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12 
bsw-nuc-2        total:199  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:41 
byt-nuc          total:199  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:41 
hsw-brixbox      total:200  pass:174  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26 
hsw-gt2          total:200  pass:178  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:21 
ilk-hp8440p      total:200  pass:139  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:61 
ivb-t430s        total:200  pass:169  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:31 
skl-i7k-2        total:200  pass:173  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27 
skl-nuci5        total:200  pass:189  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11 
snb-dellxps      total:200  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:42 
snb-x220t        total:200  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:41 
bdw-ultra failed to connect after reboot

Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_2067/

f814551aa7232ed36d71244dd148b48660b53a78 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-04m-25d-11h-36m-27s UTC integration manifest
1661280 drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-26  9:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-26  9:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: bail in alloc_pdp when !FULL_48BIT_PPGTT Matthew Auld
2016-04-26  9:31 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-26  9:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox