From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [CI 16/17] drm/i915/gen9: Reject display updates that exceed wm limitations (v2)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 07:06:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463061971-19638-17-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463061971-19638-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
If we can't find any valid level 0 watermark values for the requested
atomic transaction, reject the configuration before we try to start
programming the hardware.
v2:
- Add extra debugging output when we reject level 0 watermarks so that
we can more easily debug how/why they were rejected.
Cc: Lyude Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 3b00e0d..5c925f3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3306,7 +3306,22 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (res_blocks >= ddb_allocation || res_lines > 31) {
*enabled = false;
- return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If there are no valid level 0 watermarks, then we can't
+ * support this display configuration.
+ */
+ if (level) {
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations\n");
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Plane %d.%d: blocks required = %u/%u, lines required = %u/31\n",
+ to_intel_crtc(cstate->base.crtc)->pipe,
+ skl_wm_plane_id(to_intel_plane(pstate->plane)),
+ res_blocks, ddb_allocation, res_lines);
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
*out_blocks = res_blocks;
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-12 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 14:05 [CI 00/17] Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks (final CI run) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 01/17] drm/i915: Reorganize WM structs/unions in CRTC state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 02/17] drm/i915: Rename s/skl_compute_pipe_wm/skl_build_pipe_wm/ Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 03/17] drm/i915/gen9: Cache plane data rates in CRTC state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 04/17] drm/i915/gen9: Allow calculation of data rate for in-flight state (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 05/17] drm/i915/gen9: Store plane minimum blocks in CRTC wm " Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 06/17] drm/i915: Track whether an atomic transaction changes the active CRTC's Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 07/17] drm/i915/gen9: Allow skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() to operate on in-flight state (v3) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 08/17] drm/i915: Add distrust_bios_wm flag to dev_priv (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 09/17] drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time (v4) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 10/17] drm/i915/gen9: Drop re-allocation of DDB at atomic commit (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 11/17] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate plane WM's from state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 12/17] drm/i915/gen9: Allow watermark calculation on in-flight atomic state (v3) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 13/17] drm/i915/gen9: Use a bitmask to track dirty pipe watermarks Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 14/17] drm/i915/gen9: Propagate watermark calculation failures up the call chain Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 15/17] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' Matt Roper
2016-05-12 22:11 ` [CI 15/17] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 17/17] drm/i915: Remove wm_config from dev_priv/intel_atomic_state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 15:57 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks (final CI run) Patchwork
2016-05-12 22:52 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks (final CI run) (rev2) Patchwork
2016-05-13 14:44 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463061971-19638-17-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox