public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [CI 01/17] drm/i915: Reorganize WM structs/unions in CRTC state
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 07:05:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463061971-19638-2-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463061971-19638-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Reorganize the nested structures and unions we have for pipe watermark
data in intel_crtc_state so that platform-specific data can be added in
a more sensible manner (and save a bit of memory at the same time).

The change basically changes the organization from:

        union {
                struct intel_pipe_wm ilk;
                struct intel_pipe_wm skl;
        } optimal;

        struct intel_pipe_wm intermediate /* ILK-only */

to

        union {
                struct {
                        struct intel_pipe_wm intermediate;
                        struct intel_pipe_wm optimal;
                } ilk;

                struct {
                        struct intel_pipe_wm optimal;
                } skl;
        }

There should be no functional change here, but it will allow us to add
more platform-specific fields going forward (and more easily extend to
other platform types like VLV).

While we're at it, let's move the entire watermark substructure out to
its own structure definition to make the code slightly more readable.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 18 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 1a3e69e..1b2e696 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -405,6 +405,40 @@ struct skl_pipe_wm {
 	uint32_t linetime;
 };
 
+struct intel_crtc_wm_state {
+	union {
+		struct {
+			/*
+			 * Intermediate watermarks; these can be
+			 * programmed immediately since they satisfy
+			 * both the current configuration we're
+			 * switching away from and the new
+			 * configuration we're switching to.
+			 */
+			struct intel_pipe_wm intermediate;
+
+			/*
+			 * Optimal watermarks, programmed post-vblank
+			 * when this state is committed.
+			 */
+			struct intel_pipe_wm optimal;
+		} ilk;
+
+		struct {
+			/* gen9+ only needs 1-step wm programming */
+			struct skl_pipe_wm optimal;
+		} skl;
+	};
+
+	/*
+	 * Platforms with two-step watermark programming will need to
+	 * update watermark programming post-vblank to switch from the
+	 * safe intermediate watermarks to the optimal final
+	 * watermarks.
+	 */
+	bool need_postvbl_update;
+};
+
 struct intel_crtc_state {
 	struct drm_crtc_state base;
 
@@ -558,32 +592,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
 	/* IVB sprite scaling w/a (WaCxSRDisabledForSpriteScaling:ivb) */
 	bool disable_lp_wm;
 
-	struct {
-		/*
-		 * Optimal watermarks, programmed post-vblank when this state
-		 * is committed.
-		 */
-		union {
-			struct intel_pipe_wm ilk;
-			struct skl_pipe_wm skl;
-		} optimal;
-
-		/*
-		 * Intermediate watermarks; these can be programmed immediately
-		 * since they satisfy both the current configuration we're
-		 * switching away from and the new configuration we're switching
-		 * to.
-		 */
-		struct intel_pipe_wm intermediate;
-
-		/*
-		 * Platforms with two-step watermark programming will need to
-		 * update watermark programming post-vblank to switch from the
-		 * safe intermediate watermarks to the optimal final
-		 * watermarks.
-		 */
-		bool need_postvbl_update;
-	} wm;
+	struct intel_crtc_wm_state wm;
 
 	/* Gamma mode programmed on the pipe */
 	uint32_t gamma_mode;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 1bb0f9a..540c651 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev), usable_level;
 	struct ilk_wm_maximums max;
 
-	pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.optimal.ilk;
+	pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.ilk.optimal;
 
 	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, intel_crtc, intel_plane) {
 		struct intel_plane_state *ps;
@@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ static int ilk_compute_intermediate_wm(struct drm_device *dev,
 				       struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
 				       struct intel_crtc_state *newstate)
 {
-	struct intel_pipe_wm *a = &newstate->wm.intermediate;
+	struct intel_pipe_wm *a = &newstate->wm.ilk.intermediate;
 	struct intel_pipe_wm *b = &intel_crtc->wm.active.ilk;
 	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
 
@@ -2400,7 +2400,7 @@ static int ilk_compute_intermediate_wm(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 * currently active watermarks to get values that are safe both before
 	 * and after the vblank.
 	 */
-	*a = newstate->wm.optimal.ilk;
+	*a = newstate->wm.ilk.optimal;
 	a->pipe_enabled |= b->pipe_enabled;
 	a->sprites_enabled |= b->sprites_enabled;
 	a->sprites_scaled |= b->sprites_scaled;
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ static int ilk_compute_intermediate_wm(struct drm_device *dev,
 	 * If our intermediate WM are identical to the final WM, then we can
 	 * omit the post-vblank programming; only update if it's different.
 	 */
-	if (memcmp(a, &newstate->wm.optimal.ilk, sizeof(*a)) == 0)
+	if (memcmp(a, &newstate->wm.ilk.optimal, sizeof(*a)) == 0)
 		newstate->wm.need_postvbl_update = false;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -3678,7 +3678,7 @@ static void skl_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct skl_wm_values *results = &dev_priv->wm.skl_results;
 	struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
-	struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.optimal.skl;
+	struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.skl.optimal;
 
 
 	/* Clear all dirty flags */
@@ -3757,7 +3757,7 @@ static void ilk_initial_watermarks(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(cstate->base.crtc);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->wm.wm_mutex);
-	intel_crtc->wm.active.ilk = cstate->wm.intermediate;
+	intel_crtc->wm.active.ilk = cstate->wm.ilk.intermediate;
 	ilk_program_watermarks(dev_priv);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->wm.wm_mutex);
 }
@@ -3769,7 +3769,7 @@ static void ilk_optimize_watermarks(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->wm.wm_mutex);
 	if (cstate->wm.need_postvbl_update) {
-		intel_crtc->wm.active.ilk = cstate->wm.optimal.ilk;
+		intel_crtc->wm.active.ilk = cstate->wm.ilk.optimal;
 		ilk_program_watermarks(dev_priv);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->wm.wm_mutex);
@@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ static void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 	struct skl_wm_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
 	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
 	struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
-	struct skl_pipe_wm *active = &cstate->wm.optimal.skl;
+	struct skl_pipe_wm *active = &cstate->wm.skl.optimal;
 	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
 	int level, i, max_level;
 	uint32_t temp;
@@ -3892,7 +3892,7 @@ static void ilk_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
 	struct ilk_wm_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.hw;
 	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
 	struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
-	struct intel_pipe_wm *active = &cstate->wm.optimal.ilk;
+	struct intel_pipe_wm *active = &cstate->wm.ilk.optimal;
 	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
 	static const i915_reg_t wm0_pipe_reg[] = {
 		[PIPE_A] = WM0_PIPEA_ILK,
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-12 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-12 14:05 [CI 00/17] Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks (final CI run) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 02/17] drm/i915: Rename s/skl_compute_pipe_wm/skl_build_pipe_wm/ Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 03/17] drm/i915/gen9: Cache plane data rates in CRTC state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 04/17] drm/i915/gen9: Allow calculation of data rate for in-flight state (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:05 ` [CI 05/17] drm/i915/gen9: Store plane minimum blocks in CRTC wm " Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 06/17] drm/i915: Track whether an atomic transaction changes the active CRTC's Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 07/17] drm/i915/gen9: Allow skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() to operate on in-flight state (v3) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 08/17] drm/i915: Add distrust_bios_wm flag to dev_priv (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 09/17] drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time (v4) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 10/17] drm/i915/gen9: Drop re-allocation of DDB at atomic commit (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 11/17] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate plane WM's from state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 12/17] drm/i915/gen9: Allow watermark calculation on in-flight atomic state (v3) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 13/17] drm/i915/gen9: Use a bitmask to track dirty pipe watermarks Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 14/17] drm/i915/gen9: Propagate watermark calculation failures up the call chain Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 15/17] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' Matt Roper
2016-05-12 22:11   ` [CI 15/17] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 16/17] drm/i915/gen9: Reject display updates that exceed wm limitations (v2) Matt Roper
2016-05-12 14:06 ` [CI 17/17] drm/i915: Remove wm_config from dev_priv/intel_atomic_state Matt Roper
2016-05-12 15:57 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks (final CI run) Patchwork
2016-05-12 22:52 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks (final CI run) (rev2) Patchwork
2016-05-13 14:44   ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1463061971-19638-2-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox