From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Move dpio access out of intel_display.c
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 16:30:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463491841.2669.40.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160517122602.GG27098@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 14:26 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series moves all of the calls to vlv_dpio_{read,write} to
> > intel_dpio_phy.c. I think it simplifies the surrounding code a bit.
> You still owe us all the kerneldoc for the intel_dpll_mgr.c extraction.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7294/
> I think better to complete one extraction before starting the next one,
> resulting in an even bigger mess than what we had before.
This is actually part of the same thing. These are prep patches for moving
VLV/CHV into the dpll infrastructure. But fair enough.
But I have to disagree this would create an even bigger mess. There is so much
code in intel_display.c that most static functions there are the equivalent of
an undocumented non-static function elsewhere. And since they are in the same
pile of 400+ functions, it is not obvious the documentation is missing. So I'd
claim splitting code out of intel_display.c, even if without documentation, is
an improvement.
With the current rules we transfer the burden of writing documentation from the
person that made intel_display.c longer to the one trying to make it smaller.
Maybe we should have an exception that everything in intel_display.c needs
kerneldoc?
Ander
> -Daniel
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ander
> >
> > Ander Conselvan de Oliveira (6):
> > drm/i915: Rename struct dpll to struct intel_dpll
> > drm/i915: Move dpio code of VLV/CHV dpll enabling to intel_dpio_phy.c
> > drm/i915: Merge vlv/chv _prepare_pll() with their enable counterpart
> > drm/i915: Move VLV divider readout to intel_dpio_phy.c
> > drm/i915: Move CHV divider readout to intel_dpio_phy.c
> > drm/i915: Move toggling of CHV DPIO_DCLKP_EN to intel_dpio_phy.c
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 14 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 395 ++++++-------------------------
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 10 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 2 +-
> > 8 files changed, 350 insertions(+), 337 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.5.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-13 14:14 [PATCH 0/6] Move dpio access out of intel_display.c Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Rename struct dpll to struct intel_dpll Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-17 8:25 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Move dpio code of VLV/CHV dpll enabling to intel_dpio_phy.c Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Merge vlv/chv _prepare_pll() with their enable counterpart Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Move VLV divider readout to intel_dpio_phy.c Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-13 14:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Move CHV " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-13 14:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Move toggling of CHV DPIO_DCLKP_EN " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-05-13 14:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-17 8:27 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-13 16:09 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for Move dpio access out of intel_display.c Patchwork
2016-05-17 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-17 13:30 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2016-05-17 14:04 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463491841.2669.40.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox