public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915: Move SKL+ DBUF enable/disable to display core init/uninit
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 18:48:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463672917.12342.42.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463172100-24715-12-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On pe, 2016-05-13 at 23:41 +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> SKL and BXT have the same snippets of code for enabling disabling the
> DBUF. Extract those into helpers and move the calls from
> init/unit_cdclk() to the display core init/init since this stuff isn't
> really about cdclk. Also doing the enable twice shouldn't hurt since
> you're just setting the request bit again when it was already set.
> 
> We can also toss in a few WARNs about the register values into
> skl_get_dpll0_vco() now that we know that things should always be
> sane there.
> 
> Flatten skl_init_cdclk() while at it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c    | 58 ++++-----------------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index da903b718c11..e908f360da74 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -5480,18 +5480,6 @@ static bool broxton_cdclk_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	/* TODO: Check for a valid CDCLK rate */
>  
> -	if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_REQUEST)) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CDCLK enabled, but DBUF power not requested\n");
> -
> -		return false;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CDCLK enabled, but DBUF power hasn't settled\n");
> -
> -		return false;
> -	}
> -
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -5518,26 +5506,10 @@ void broxton_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	 *   here, it belongs to modeset time
>  	 */
>  	broxton_set_cdclk(dev_priv, 624000);
> -
> -	I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
> -	POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> -
> -	udelay(10);
> -
> -	if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE))
> -		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout!\n");
>  }
>  
>  void broxton_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
> -	POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> -
> -	udelay(10);
> -
> -	if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)
> -		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout!\n");
> -
>  	/* Set minimum (bypass) frequency, in effect turning off the DE PLL */
>  	broxton_set_cdclk(dev_priv, 19200);
>  }
> @@ -5759,15 +5731,6 @@ static void skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  
>  void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	/* disable DBUF power */
> -	I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
> -	POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> -
> -	udelay(10);
> -
> -	if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)
> -		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout\n");
> -
>  	skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, 24000, 0);
>  }
>  
> @@ -5785,24 +5748,15 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		if (dev_priv->skl_preferred_vco_freq == 0)
>  			skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(dev_priv,
>  						    dev_priv->skl_vco_freq);
> -	} else {
> -		/* set CDCLK to the lowest frequency, Modeset follows */
> -		vco = dev_priv->skl_preferred_vco_freq;
> -		if (vco == 0)
> -			vco = 8100;
> -		cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
> -
> -		skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk, vco);
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* enable DBUF power */
> -	I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
> -	POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> -
> -	udelay(10);
> +	vco = dev_priv->skl_preferred_vco_freq;
> +	if (vco == 0)
> +		vco = 8100;
> +	cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
>  
> -	if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE))
> -		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
> +	skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, cdclk, vco);
>  }
>  
>  static void skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index fefe22c3c163..6817a3cb5fbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -2176,6 +2176,28 @@ static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
>  }
>  
> +static void skl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

I would've used gen9_ for these, but either way:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

> +{
> +	I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
> +	POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> +
> +	udelay(10);
> +
> +	if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE))
> +		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void skl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST);
> +	POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL);
> +
> +	udelay(10);
> +
> +	if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)
> +		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout!\n");
> +}
> +
>  static void skl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				   bool resume)
>  {
> @@ -2202,6 +2224,8 @@ static void skl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
>  
> +	skl_dbuf_enable(dev_priv);
> +
>  	if (resume && dev_priv->csr.dmc_payload)
>  		intel_csr_load_program(dev_priv);
>  }
> @@ -2213,6 +2237,8 @@ static void skl_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
> +	skl_dbuf_disable(dev_priv);
> +
>  	skl_uninit_cdclk(dev_priv);
>  
>  	/* The spec doesn't call for removing the reset handshake flag */
> @@ -2257,6 +2283,9 @@ void bxt_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
>  
>  	broxton_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
> +
> +	skl_dbuf_enable(dev_priv);
> +
>  	broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev_priv);
>  
>  	broxton_cdclk_verify_state(dev_priv);
> @@ -2274,6 +2303,9 @@ void bxt_display_core_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
>  	broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(dev_priv);
> +
> +	skl_dbuf_disable(dev_priv);
> +
>  	broxton_uninit_cdclk(dev_priv);
>  
>  	/* The spec doesn't call for removing the reset handshake flag */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-19 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-13 20:41 [PATCH 00/21] drm/i915: SKL/KBL/BXT cdclk stuff ville.syrjala
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 01/21] drm/i915: Fix BXT min_pixclk after state readout ville.syrjala
2016-05-17 18:09   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-17 18:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-17 18:24       ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915/skl: SKL CDCLK change on modeset tracking VCO ville.syrjala
2016-05-19  9:08   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-19  9:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915: Move the SKL DPLL0 VCO computation into intel_dp_compute_config() ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 11:57   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915: Extract skl_calc_cdclk() ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 12:02   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 05/21] drm/i915: Actually read out DPLL0 vco on skl from hardware ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 12:38   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: Report the current DPLL0 vco on SKL/KBL ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 12:40   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 07/21] drm/i915: Allow enable/disable of DPLL0 around cdclk changes on SKL ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 13:04   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-19 13:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-19 13:39       ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 08/21] drm/i915: Keep track of preferred cdclk vco frequency " ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 14:25   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 09/21] drm/i915: Beef up skl_sanitize_cdclk() a bit ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 14:30   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 10/21] drm/i915: Unify SKL cdclk init paths ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 15:43   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-23 18:20     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915: Move SKL+ DBUF enable/disable to display core init/uninit ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 15:48   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2016-05-23 18:20     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 12/21] drm/i915: Make 308 and 671 MHz cdclks more accurate on SKL ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 16:03   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 13/21] drm/i915: Rename skl_vco_freq to cdclk_pll.vco ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 16:17   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-19 16:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 14/21] drm/i915: Store cdclk PLL reference clock under dev_priv ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 17:00   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 15/21] drm/i915: Extract bxt DE PLL enable/disable from broxton_set_cdclk() ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 17:04   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 16/21] drm/i915: Store BXT DE PLL vco and ref clocks in dev_priv ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 18:43   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 17/21] drm/i915: Update cached cdclk state from broxton_init_cdclk() ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 18:46   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 18/21] drm/i915: Rewrite broxton_get_display_clock_speed() in terms of the DE PLL vco/refclk ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 19:05   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915: Make bxt_set_cdclk() operate in terms of the current vs target DE PLL vco ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 19:40   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 20/21] drm/i915: Replace bxt_verify_cdclk_state() with a more generic cdclk check ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 19:41   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-13 20:41 ` [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: Set BXT cdclk to minimum initially ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 19:45   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-14  5:25 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: SKL/KBL/BXT cdclk stuff Patchwork
2016-05-23 17:25   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-16 13:59 ` [PATCH 22/21] drm/i915: Assert the dbuf is enabled when disabling DC5/6 ville.syrjala
2016-05-19 19:49   ` Imre Deak
2016-05-23 18:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-23 18:21 ` [PATCH 00/21] drm/i915: SKL/KBL/BXT cdclk stuff Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1463672917.12342.42.camel@intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox