Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked

[Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>]

On ti, 2016-05-24 at 13:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL
> is off if it's not locked
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7631/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Series 7631v1 Series without cover letter
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7631/revisions/1/mbox
> 
> Test gem_busy:
>         Subgroup basic-parallel-vebox:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test gem_exec_basic:
>         Subgroup readonly-vebox:
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)

[drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632

> Test gem_exec_flush:
>         Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (ro-byt-n2820)

Stack trace:
  #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
  #1 [gem_execbuf+0x44]
  #2 [batch+0x4bd]
  #3 [__real_main481+0x308]
  #4 [main+0x23]
  #5 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
  #6 [_start+0x29]
  #7 [<unknown>+0x29]
child 0 failed with exit status 99

(gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0
(gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -22 != 0
Subtest basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd failed.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95372

> Test gem_exec_store:
>         Subgroup basic-bsd:
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test gem_ringfill:
>         Subgroup basic-default-interruptible:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test gem_storedw_loop:
>         Subgroup basic-default:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>         Subgroup bad-pipe:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
>         Subgroup psr_basic:
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test kms_setmode:
>         Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc:
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test pm_rpm:
>         Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
>                 fail       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)

All the remaining WARNs are the above "Potential atomic update failure"
 error message, so assuming the same bug as above.

> 
> ro-bdw-i5-
> 5250u  total:209  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> ro-bdw-i7-
> 5557U  total:209  pass:197  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12 
> ro-bdw-i7-
> 5600u  total:209  pass:180  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:28 
> ro-byt-
> n2820     total:209  pass:169  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:37 
> ro-hsw-i3-
> 4010u  total:209  pass:186  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23 
> ro-hsw-i7-
> 4770r  total:209  pass:186  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23 
> ro-ilk-i7-
> 620lm  total:209  pass:146  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:62 
> ro-ilk1-i5-
> 650   total:204  pass:146  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:57 
> ro-ivb-i7-
> 3770   total:209  pass:177  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32 
> ro-ivb2-i7-
> 3770  total:209  pass:181  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28 
> ro-skl-i7-6700hq
> total:204  pass:175  dwarn:8   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
> ro-snb-i7-
> 2620M  total:209  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:38 
> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_993/
> 
> 8621fb5 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-23d-18h-18m-33s UTC integration
> manifest
> a416d47 drm/i915/bxt: Sanitize CDCLK to fix breakage during S4 resume
> c1d96b1 drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx