Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked

[Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>]

On ti, 2016-05-24 at 16:18 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ti, 2016-05-24 at 13:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL
> > is off if it's not locked
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7631/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Series 7631v1 Series without cover letter
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7631/revisions/1/mbox
> > 
> > Test gem_busy:
> >         Subgroup basic-parallel-vebox:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test gem_exec_basic:
> >         Subgroup readonly-vebox:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> 
> [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A
> 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
> 
> > Test gem_exec_flush:
> >         Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (ro-byt-n2820)
> 
> Stack trace:
>   #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
>   #1 [gem_execbuf+0x44]
>   #2 [batch+0x4bd]
>   #3 [__real_main481+0x308]
>   #4 [main+0x23]
>   #5 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
>   #6 [_start+0x29]
>   #7 [+0x29]
> child 0 failed with exit status 99
> 
> (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0
> (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -22 != 0
> Subtest basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd failed.
> 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
> 
> > Test gem_exec_store:
> >         Subgroup basic-bsd:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test gem_ringfill:
> >         Subgroup basic-default-interruptible:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test gem_storedw_loop:
> >         Subgroup basic-default:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> >         Subgroup bad-pipe:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
> >         Subgroup psr_basic:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test kms_setmode:
> >         Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test pm_rpm:
> >         Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> >                 fail       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> 
> All the remaining WARNs are the above "Potential atomic update failure"
>  error message, so assuming the same bug as above.

I pushed the patchset to -dinq, thanks for the review.

> > ro-bdw-i5-
> > 5250u  total:209  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> > ro-bdw-i7-
> > 5557U  total:209  pass:197  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12 
> > ro-bdw-i7-
> > 5600u  total:209  pass:180  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:28 
> > ro-byt-
> > n2820     total:209  pass:169  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:37 
> > ro-hsw-i3-
> > 4010u  total:209  pass:186  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23 
> > ro-hsw-i7-
> > 4770r  total:209  pass:186  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23 
> > ro-ilk-i7-
> > 620lm  total:209  pass:146  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:62 
> > ro-ilk1-i5-
> > 650   total:204  pass:146  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:57 
> > ro-ivb-i7-
> > 3770   total:209  pass:177  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32 
> > ro-ivb2-i7-
> > 3770  total:209  pass:181  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28 
> > ro-skl-i7-6700hq
> > total:204  pass:175  dwarn:8   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
> > ro-snb-i7-
> > 2620M  total:209  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:38 
> > 
> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_993/
> > 
> > 8621fb5 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-23d-18h-18m-33s UTC integration
> > manifest
> > a416d47 drm/i915/bxt: Sanitize CDCLK to fix breakage during S4 resume
> > c1d96b1 drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx