public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tim.gore@intel.com
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915:gen9: implement WaMtpRenderPowerGatingBug
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:08:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466428107-2210-1-git-send-email-tim.gore@intel.com> (raw)

From: Tim Gore <tim.gore@intel.com>

This patch applies WaMtpRenderPowerGatingBug which
overcomes a hang during mid thread pre-emption when
running OCL test: test_allocations64.exe single 5 all.

v2: Fix build break due to some git fail on my part
    Fix camel case variable names (Dave Gordon)
    Only apply to G0 stepping (Chris Harris)

Signed-off-by: Tim Gore <tim.gore@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  5 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 25ebe46..c1f2d66 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2717,6 +2717,7 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
 #define SKL_REVID_D0		0x3
 #define SKL_REVID_E0		0x4
 #define SKL_REVID_F0		0x5
+#define SKL_REVID_G0		0x6
 
 #define IS_SKL_REVID(p, since, until) (IS_SKYLAKE(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index c6bfbf8..a14e5a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
 #define GEN8_CONFIG0			_MMIO(0xD00)
 #define  GEN9_DEFAULT_FIXES		(1 << 3 | 1 << 2 | 1 << 1)
 
+/* Slice GateWay mmio offset and related info*/
+#define GEN9_GW_DEST			_MMIO(0xE220)
+#define   GEN9_GW_DATA_PAIRS		32
+#define   GEN9_GW_PER_SLICE		3
+
 #define GAC_ECO_BITS			_MMIO(0x14090)
 #define   ECOBITS_SNB_BIT		(1<<13)
 #define   ECOBITS_PPGTT_CACHE64B	(3<<8)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index debed01..cc7dd1b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1261,6 +1261,53 @@ static int gen8_init_perctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	return wa_ctx_end(wa_ctx, *offset = index, 1);
 }
 
+/* Function to implement WaMtpRenderPowerGatingBug:skl */
+static int wa_mtp_render_power_gating(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+					uint32_t *const batch, uint32_t index)
+{
+	uint32_t num_lri = 0;
+	uint32_t gw_write_value = 0;
+	i915_reg_t gw_dest_mmio = {0};
+	uint32_t i = 0;
+	uint32_t gw_count = 0;
+	uint32_t slice_count_max = engine->i915->info.slice_total;
+	uint32_t slice_count = 0;
+
+	/* Slice count should be non-zero */
+	WARN_ON(slice_count_max == 0);
+
+	/* Mmios for GW are nice and sequential across slices, so we can
+	 * just do this single slice logic 3 times and the 'DestMmio will
+	 * be calculated properly'
+	 */
+	for (slice_count = 0; slice_count < slice_count_max; slice_count++) {
+		/* write the load reg immediate header */
+		num_lri = (GEN9_GW_PER_SLICE * GEN9_GW_DATA_PAIRS) + 1;
+		wa_ctx_emit(batch, index,
+			MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(num_lri) | MI_LRI_FORCE_POSTED);
+
+		for (gw_count = 0; gw_count < GEN9_GW_PER_SLICE; gw_count++) {
+			gw_dest_mmio.reg = GEN9_GW_DEST.reg + (0x10 * gw_count)
+					+ (0x40 * slice_count);
+
+			for (i = 0; i < GEN9_GW_DATA_PAIRS; i++) {
+				// Read bits [31:24] from the Context Offset to [7:0] of LRI
+				// Read bit [13] from Context Offset to [31] of LRI
+				// Put i into bits [28:24] of LRI
+				gw_write_value = 0x1;
+				gw_write_value |= i << 24;
+				wa_ctx_emit_reg(batch, index, gw_dest_mmio);
+				wa_ctx_emit(batch, index, gw_write_value);
+			}
+		}
+		// Add one more 'dummy' data pair because the last MMIO in an LRI isn't actually 'posted'
+		wa_ctx_emit_reg(batch, index, gw_dest_mmio);
+		wa_ctx_emit(batch, index, gw_write_value);
+	}
+	return index;
+}
+
+
 static int gen9_init_indirectctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 				    struct i915_wa_ctx_bb *wa_ctx,
 				    uint32_t *const batch,
@@ -1296,6 +1343,16 @@ static int gen9_init_indirectctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 		wa_ctx_emit(batch, index, 0);
 		wa_ctx_emit(batch, index, 0);
 	}
+
+	/* WaMtpRenderPowerGatingBug:skl*/
+	if (IS_SKL_REVID(engine->i915, 0, SKL_REVID_G0))
+	{
+		ret = wa_mtp_render_power_gating(engine, batch, index);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	index = ret;
+
 	/* Pad to end of cacheline */
 	while (index % CACHELINE_DWORDS)
 		wa_ctx_emit(batch, index, MI_NOOP);
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-20 13:08 tim.gore [this message]
2016-06-20 13:25 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915:gen9: implement WaMtpRenderPowerGatingBug (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466428107-2210-1-git-send-email-tim.gore@intel.com \
    --to=tim.gore@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox