From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use atomic waits for short non-atomic ones
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:51:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467114710-29989-2-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467114710-29989-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
usleep_range is not recommended for waits shorten than 10us.
Make the wait_for_us use the atomic variant for such waits.
To do so we need to disable the !in_atomic warning for such uses
and also disable preemption since the macro is written in a way
to only be safe to be used in atomic context (local_clock() and
no second COND check after the timeout).
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 3156d8df7921..e21bf6e6f119 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -69,20 +69,21 @@
})
#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for((COND), (MS) * 1000, 1000)
-#define wait_for_us(COND, US) _wait_for((COND), (US), 1)
/* If CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled, in_atomic() always reports false. */
#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)
-# define _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_atomic())
+# define _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK(ATOMIC) WARN_ON_ONCE((ATOMIC) && !in_atomic())
#else
-# define _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK do { } while (0)
+# define _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK(ATOMIC) do { } while (0)
#endif
-#define _wait_for_atomic(COND, US) ({ \
+#define _wait_for_atomic(COND, US, ATOMIC) ({ \
unsigned long end__; \
int ret__ = 0; \
- _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK; \
- BUILD_BUG_ON((US) > 50000); \
+ _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK(ATOMIC); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((ATOMIC) && (US) > 50000); \
+ if (!(ATOMIC)) \
+ preempt_disable(); \
end__ = (local_clock() >> 10) + (US) + 1; \
while (!(COND)) { \
if (time_after((unsigned long)(local_clock() >> 10), end__)) { \
@@ -97,11 +98,23 @@
} \
cpu_relax(); \
} \
+ if (!(ATOMIC)) \
+ preempt_enable(); \
ret__; \
})
-#define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) _wait_for_atomic((COND), (MS) * 1000)
-#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) _wait_for_atomic((COND), (US))
+#define wait_for_us(COND, US) \
+({ \
+ int ret__; \
+ if ((US) > 10) \
+ ret__ = _wait_for((COND), (US), 10); \
+ else \
+ ret__ = _wait_for_atomic((COND), (US), 0); \
+ ret__; \
+})
+
+#define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) _wait_for_atomic((COND), (MS) * 1000, 1)
+#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) _wait_for_atomic((COND), (US), 1)
#define KHz(x) (1000 * (x))
#define MHz(x) KHz(1000 * (x))
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-28 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 11:51 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/debug: Select PREEMPT_COUNT when enabling debugging Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-28 11:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-06-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use atomic waits for short non-atomic ones Imre Deak
2016-06-28 13:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-28 13:53 ` Imre Deak
2016-06-28 14:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-28 17:45 ` Imre Deak
2016-06-28 13:55 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 14:14 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 14:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-28 15:39 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 16:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-28 16:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-28 19:55 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 11:27 ` [PATCH v5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 11:37 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 12:41 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/debug: Select PREEMPT_COUNT when enabling debugging Patchwork
2016-06-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Chris Wilson
2016-06-28 15:24 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-28 16:39 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/debug: Select PREEMPT_COUNT when enabling debugging (rev2) Patchwork
2016-06-28 17:03 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/debug: Select PREEMPT_COUNT when enabling debugging (rev3) Patchwork
2016-06-28 19:59 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 9:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 10:11 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/debug: Select PREEMPT_COUNT when enabling debugging (rev4) Patchwork
2016-06-29 11:50 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/debug: Select PREEMPT_COUNT when enabling debugging (rev5) Patchwork
2016-06-29 14:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467114710-29989-2-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox