public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:09:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467212972-861-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Introduce a function which initializes vfuncs mostly common
across engines and move write_tail initialization in it since
only one engine overrides the default.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 04a2d141e690..b715707947d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -2873,6 +2873,12 @@ static int gen6_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void intel_ring_default_vfuncs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+				      struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
+}
+
 int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
@@ -2886,6 +2892,8 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 	engine->hw_id = 0;
 	engine->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE;
 
+	intel_ring_default_vfuncs(dev_priv, engine);
+
 	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) {
 		if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev_priv)) {
 			obj = i915_gem_object_create(dev, 4096);
@@ -2977,7 +2985,6 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 		}
 		engine->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT;
 	}
-	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
 
 	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
 		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = hsw_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
@@ -3036,7 +3043,8 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BSD;
 	engine->hw_id = 1;
 
-	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
+	intel_ring_default_vfuncs(dev_priv, engine);
+
 	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
 		engine->mmio_base = GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE;
 		/* gen6 bsd needs a special wa for tail updates */
@@ -3114,9 +3122,10 @@ int intel_init_bsd2_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 	engine->id = VCS2;
 	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BSD;
 	engine->hw_id = 4;
-
-	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
 	engine->mmio_base = GEN8_BSD2_RING_BASE;
+
+	intel_ring_default_vfuncs(dev_priv, engine);
+
 	engine->flush = gen6_bsd_ring_flush;
 	engine->add_request = gen6_add_request;
 	engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
@@ -3147,9 +3156,10 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 	engine->id = BCS;
 	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BLT;
 	engine->hw_id = 2;
-
 	engine->mmio_base = BLT_RING_BASE;
-	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
+
+	intel_ring_default_vfuncs(dev_priv, engine);
+
 	engine->flush = gen6_ring_flush;
 	engine->add_request = gen6_add_request;
 	engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
@@ -3207,9 +3217,10 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
 	engine->id = VECS;
 	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_VEBOX;
 	engine->hw_id = 3;
-
 	engine->mmio_base = VEBOX_RING_BASE;
-	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
+
+	intel_ring_default_vfuncs(dev_priv, engine);
+
 	engine->flush = gen6_ring_flush;
 	engine->add_request = gen6_add_request;
 	engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29 15:09 Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Consolidate add_request vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Consolidate seqno_barrier vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get and put irq vfuncs Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get/set_seqno Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Consolidate init_hw vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Consolidate dispatch_execbuffer vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:40   ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-30 15:12     ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Consolidate semaphore vfuncs init Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore object creation into intel_ring_init_semaphores Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:30   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Compact Gen8 semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:31   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Compact gen8_ring_sync Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:33   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:34   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:41     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:00       ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:14         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:24           ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:34             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:43               ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 13:13         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-19 18:38           ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20  9:54             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 12:50               ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 16:07                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 17:08                   ` Dave Gordon
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Trim some if-else braces Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:35   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:06 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Patchwork
2016-06-30  5:20 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2) Patchwork
2016-06-30  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-27 14:04 [PATCH 00/13] Legacy engine initialization refactoring Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-27 14:04 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467212972-861-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox