From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: refactor eb_get_batch()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:12:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467299569-10920-2-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467299569-10920-1-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Precursor for fix to secure batch execution. We will need to be able to
retrieve the batch VMA (as well as the batch itself) from the eb list,
so this patch extracts that part of eb_get_batch() into a separate
function, and moves both parts to a more logical place in the file, near
where the eb list is created.
Also, it may not be obvious, but the current execbuffer2 ioctl interface
requires that the buffer object containing the batch-to-be-executed be
the LAST entry in the exec2_list[] array (I expected it to be the first!).
To clarify this, we can replace the rather obscure construct
"list_entry(eb->vmas.prev, ...)"
in the old version of eb_get_batch() with the equivalent but more explicit
"list_last_entry(&eb->vmas,...)"
in the new eb_get_batch_vma() and of course add an explanatory comment.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 608fdc4..eea8b1f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -186,6 +186,35 @@ struct eb_vmas {
return ret;
}
+static inline struct i915_vma *
+eb_get_batch_vma(struct eb_vmas *eb)
+{
+ /* The batch is always the LAST item in the VMA list */
+ struct i915_vma *vma = list_last_entry(&eb->vmas, typeof(*vma), exec_list);
+
+ return vma;
+}
+
+static struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+eb_get_batch(struct eb_vmas *eb)
+{
+ struct i915_vma *vma = eb_get_batch_vma(eb);
+
+ /*
+ * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
+ * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
+ * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
+ * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
+ *
+ * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
+ * paranoia do it everywhere.
+ */
+ if ((vma->exec_entry->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED) == 0)
+ vma->exec_entry->flags |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
+
+ return vma->obj;
+}
+
static struct i915_vma *eb_get_vma(struct eb_vmas *eb, unsigned long handle)
{
if (eb->and < 0) {
@@ -1341,26 +1370,6 @@ static bool only_mappable_for_reloc(unsigned int flags)
return file_priv->bsd_ring;
}
-static struct drm_i915_gem_object *
-eb_get_batch(struct eb_vmas *eb)
-{
- struct i915_vma *vma = list_entry(eb->vmas.prev, typeof(*vma), exec_list);
-
- /*
- * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads
- * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the
- * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed
- * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen.
- *
- * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for
- * paranoia do it everywhere.
- */
- if ((vma->exec_entry->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED) == 0)
- vma->exec_entry->flags |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS;
-
- return vma->obj;
-}
-
#define I915_USER_RINGS (4)
static const enum intel_engine_id user_ring_map[I915_USER_RINGS + 1] = {
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 15:12 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: compile-time consistency check on __EXEC_OBJECT flags Dave Gordon
2016-06-30 15:12 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-07-13 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: refactor eb_get_batch() Daniel Vetter
2016-07-13 12:44 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-14 13:12 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-14 14:03 ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 8:03 ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-19 7:16 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-30 15:42 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: compile-time consistency check on __EXEC_OBJECT flags Patchwork
2016-07-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-06 9:52 Dave Gordon
2016-07-06 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: refactor eb_get_batch() Dave Gordon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467299569-10920-2-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox