public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: rename & update eb_select_ring()
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:16:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469034967-15840-4-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469034967-15840-1-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com>

'ring' is an old deprecated term for a GPU engine, so we're trying to
phase out all such terminology. eb_select_ring() not only has 'ring'
(meaning engine) in its name, but it has an ugly calling convention
whereby it returns an errno and stores a pointer-to-engine indirectly
through an output parameter. As there is only one error it ever returns
(-EINVAL), we can make it return the pointer directly, and have the
caller pass back the error code -EINVAL if the pointer result is NULL.

Thus we can replace
-	ret = eb_select_ring(dev_priv, file, args, &engine);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
with
+	engine = eb_select_engine(dev_priv, file, args);
+	if (!engine)
+		return -EINVAL;
for increased clarity and maybe save a few cycles too.

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 32 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 6482ec2..f8d8ae3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1380,24 +1380,24 @@ static bool only_mappable_for_reloc(unsigned int flags)
 	[I915_EXEC_VEBOX]	= VECS
 };
 
-static int
-eb_select_ring(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-	       struct drm_file *file,
-	       struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
-	       struct intel_engine_cs **ring)
+static struct intel_engine_cs *
+eb_select_engine(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+		 struct drm_file *file,
+		 struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args)
 {
 	unsigned int user_ring_id = args->flags & I915_EXEC_RING_MASK;
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
 
 	if (user_ring_id > I915_USER_RINGS) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown ring: %u\n", user_ring_id);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	if ((user_ring_id != I915_EXEC_BSD) &&
 	    ((args->flags & I915_EXEC_BSD_MASK) != 0)) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with non bsd ring but with invalid "
 			  "bsd dispatch flags: %d\n", (int)(args->flags));
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	if (user_ring_id == I915_EXEC_BSD && HAS_BSD2(dev_priv)) {
@@ -1412,20 +1412,20 @@ static bool only_mappable_for_reloc(unsigned int flags)
 		} else {
 			DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown bsd ring: %u\n",
 				  bsd_idx);
-			return -EINVAL;
+			return NULL;
 		}
 
-		*ring = &dev_priv->engine[_VCS(bsd_idx)];
+		engine = &dev_priv->engine[_VCS(bsd_idx)];
 	} else {
-		*ring = &dev_priv->engine[user_ring_map[user_ring_id]];
+		engine = &dev_priv->engine[user_ring_map[user_ring_id]];
 	}
 
-	if (!intel_engine_initialized(*ring)) {
+	if (!intel_engine_initialized(engine)) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with invalid ring: %u\n", user_ring_id);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return engine;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -1467,9 +1467,9 @@ static bool only_mappable_for_reloc(unsigned int flags)
 	if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_IS_PINNED)
 		dispatch_flags |= I915_DISPATCH_PINNED;
 
-	ret = eb_select_ring(dev_priv, file, args, &engine);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	engine = eb_select_engine(dev_priv, file, args);
+	if (!engine)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (args->buffer_count < 1) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with %d buffers\n", args->buffer_count);
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-20 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20 17:16 Reduce usage of the name 'ring' for engines et al Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: rename macro parameter(ring) to (engine) Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 17:28   ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: rename 'ring' where it refers to an engine or engine_id Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 17:29   ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 17:16 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-07-20 17:31   ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: rename & update eb_select_ring() Chris Wilson
2016-07-21  9:36     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 17:25 ` Reduce usage of the name 'ring' for engines et al Chris Wilson
2016-07-21  5:49 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: rename macro parameter(ring) to (engine) Patchwork
2016-07-21  9:08   ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469034967-15840-4-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox