Re: [PATCH 23/31] drm/i915/lrc: Update function names to match request flow

[Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>]

On ma, 2016-07-25 at 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> With adding engine->submit_request, we now have a bunch of functions
> with similar names used at different stages of the execlist submission.
> Try a different coat of paint, to hopefully reduce confusion between the
> requests, intel_engine_cs and the actual execlists submision process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

You forgot to pick my R-b from previous series, to make it easier for
Patchwork, here it is again;

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index a9ca31c113c3..149a0dc7aeed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -384,8 +384,8 @@ static void execlists_update_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>  		execlists_update_context_pdps(ppgtt, reg_state);
>  }
>  
> -static void execlists_submit_requests(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
> -				      struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq1)
> +static void execlists_elsp_submit_contexts(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
> +					   struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq1)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = rq0->i915;
>  	unsigned int fw_domains = rq0->engine->fw_domains;
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static inline void execlists_context_status_change(
>  	atomic_notifier_call_chain(&rq->ctx->status_notifier, status, rq);
>  }
>  
> -static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +static void execlists_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_request *req0 = NULL, *req1 = NULL;
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_request *cursor, *tmp;
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  		req0->tail &= req0->ring->size - 1;
>  	}
>  
> -	execlists_submit_requests(req0, req1);
> +	execlists_elsp_submit_contexts(req0, req1);
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>  	if (submit_contexts) {
>  		if (!engine->disable_lite_restore_wa ||
>  		    (csb[i][0] & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE))
> -			execlists_context_unqueue(engine);
> +			execlists_unqueue(engine);
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&engine->execlist_lock);
> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
>  		DRM_ERROR("More than two context complete events?\n");
>  }
>  
> -static void execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> +static void execlists_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>  {
>  	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_request *cursor;
> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static void execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>  	list_add_tail(&request->execlist_link, &engine->execlist_queue);
>  	request->ctx_hw_id = request->ctx->hw_id;
>  	if (num_elements == 0)
> -		execlists_context_unqueue(engine);
> +		execlists_unqueue(engine);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
>  }
> @@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  	engine->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
>  	engine->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush;
>  	engine->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
> -	engine->submit_request = execlists_context_queue;
> +	engine->submit_request = execlists_submit_request;
>  
>  	engine->irq_enable = gen8_logical_ring_enable_irq;
>  	engine->irq_disable = gen8_logical_ring_disable_irq;
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx