From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Clean-up intel_enable_source_psr1()
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 01:47:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14705705.6BrEU4IqqS@dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499811596-14634-2-git-send-email-jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:19:53 PM PDT Jim Bride wrote:
> On SKL+ there is a bit in SRD_CTL that software is not supposed to
> modify, but we currently clobber that bit when we enable PSR. In
> order to preserve the value of that bit, go ahead and read SRD_CTL
And which bit is that?
> and
> do a field-wise setting of the various bits that we need to initialize
> before writing the register back out. Additionally, go ahead and
> explicitly disable single-frame update since we aren't currently
> supporting it.
I see a caller to intel_psr_single_frame_update()
>
> v2: * Do a field-wise init on EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME even though we
> always set it to the max value. (Rodrigo)
> * Rebase
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Cc: Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index c712d01..3e62429 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -3789,18 +3789,22 @@ enum {
> #define EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_4_LINES (1<<25)
> #define EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_2_LINES (2<<25)
> #define EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_0_LINES (3<<25)
> +#define EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_MASK (0x1f<<20)
> #define EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT 20
> #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT (1<<12)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL (0<<11)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL (1<<11)
> +#define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_MASK (3<<8)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us (0<<8)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us (1<<8)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us (2<<8)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us (3<<8)
> +#define EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_MASK (0x3<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_500us (0<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us (1<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us (2<<4)
> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us (3<<4)
> +#define EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_MASK (0xf<<0)
> #define EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT 0
>
> #define EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL _MMIO(dev_priv->psr_mmio_base + 0x10)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 559f1ab..132987b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -280,17 +280,32 @@ static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp) * with the 5 or 6 idle patterns.
> */
> uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> - uint32_t val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> + uint32_t val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
>
> + val |= EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
> +
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_MASK;
> val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
> +
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_MASK;
> val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
>
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_MASK;
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES is (0<<25)
We can just remove the two lines above, I think it's just misleading to do a
nop after checking for Haswell.
Curious how the entry time is determined, the rest seem to come from VBT.
>
> - if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
> + if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) {
> val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
>
> + /* SFU should only be enabled with link standby, but for
> + * now we do not support it. */
> + val &= ~BDW_PSR_SINGLE_FRAME;
> + } else {
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
> + val &= ~BDW_PSR_SINGLE_FRAME;
> + }
> +
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_MASK;
> if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 5)
> val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
> else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 1)
> @@ -300,6 +315,7 @@ static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp) else
> val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
>
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_MASK;
> if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5)
> val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us;
> else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 1)
> @@ -309,6 +325,7 @@ static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp) else
> val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
>
> + val &= ~EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL;
> if (intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(intel_dp) &&
> drm_dp_tps3_supported(intel_dp->dpcd))
> val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-12 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 22:19 [PATCH v3 0/4] Kernel PSR Fix-ups Jim Bride
2017-07-11 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Clean-up intel_enable_source_psr1() Jim Bride
2017-07-12 8:47 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2017-07-12 10:05 ` Chris Wilson
2017-07-14 9:34 ` Jani Nikula
2017-08-03 21:48 ` Jim Bride
2017-08-04 7:29 ` Jani Nikula
2017-08-07 15:55 ` Jim Bride
2017-08-07 17:17 ` Jim Bride
2017-07-11 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Account for sink CRC raciness on some panels Jim Bride
2017-07-11 23:37 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-07-12 9:42 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-07-14 9:46 ` Jani Nikula
2017-07-14 16:04 ` Jim Bride
2017-07-11 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available Jim Bride
2017-07-11 23:27 ` Chris Wilson
2017-07-12 19:59 ` Jim Bride
2017-07-11 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-07-11 23:16 ` Chris Wilson
2017-07-12 21:36 ` Manasi Navare
2017-07-12 21:38 ` Chris Wilson
2017-07-12 21:53 ` Manasi Navare
2017-07-12 22:01 ` Jim Bride
2017-07-12 21:28 ` Manasi Navare
2017-07-11 22:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Kernel PSR Fix-ups Patchwork
2017-07-18 21:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Clean-up intel_enable_source_psr1() Jim Bride
2017-07-18 21:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Account for sink CRC raciness on some panels Jim Bride
2017-08-03 18:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-08-04 18:38 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-08-07 15:58 ` Jim Bride
2017-07-18 21:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-07-18 21:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available Jim Bride
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14705705.6BrEU4IqqS@dk \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=wayne.boyer@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).