Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] svm support

Chris Wilson
2016-08-15T13:43:19Z

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:03PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now when fences got merged I reworked the series. It is now much
> smaller in size. Some items are still missing like error state recording,
> fault handling, documentation and in fences.

What's the plan for KMS integration?

We didn't like using userptr for framebuffer objects for the reason the
backing pages do not perist beyond the process (or mmap).

So create regular objects for KMS and CPU mmap them for SVM use?
-Chris

--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre