Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] drm/i915: add SVM execbuf ioctl v10

Chris Wilson
2016-08-15T12:10:06Z

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
>
> We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags, since we
> don't have to worry about buffer relocation or any of the other usual
> stuff. Returns a fence to be used for synchronization.
>
> v2: add a request after batch submission (Jesse)
> v3: add a flag for fence creation (Chris)
> v4: add CLOEXEC flag (Kristian)
> add non-RCS ring support (Jesse)
> v5: update for request alloc change (Jesse)
> v6: new sync file interface, error paths, request breadcrumbs
> v7: always CLOEXEC for sync_file_install
> v8: rebase on new sync file api
> v9: rework on top of fence requests and sync_file
> v10: take fence ref for sync_file (Chris)
> use correct flush (Chris)
> limit exec on rcs

This is incomplete, so just proof of principle?
-Chris

--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre