From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: S4 resume breakage with i915 driver
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:54:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472482485.4707.13.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5heg574pr4.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On ma, 2016-08-29 at 16:24 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:09:23 +0200,
> Imre Deak wrote:
> >
> > On ma, 2016-08-29 at 15:32 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:42:47PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > On pe, 2016-08-26 at 14:10 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > > On pe, 2016-08-26 at 11:39 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:25:01PM +0200, Takashi Iwai
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:18:00 +0200,
> > > > > > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > > > > I had to modify the intel_gpu_reset() call because the
> > > > > > > > test was
> > > > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > on the older kernel, so it's like:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > + intel_gpu_reset(dev_to_i915(dev)->dev);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And, it seems working on HSW! \o/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A simple trick, better than the magical register write
> > > > > > > > revert.
> > > > > > > > I'll check other machines, too, to see whether it has
> > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > negative
> > > > > > > > impact.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The test results look good on all machines.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The theory then is that the GPU's are active across the
> > > > > > load of the
> > > > > > hibernation image and so before the GTT is updated the
> > > > > > memory
> > > > > > currently
> > > > > > in use by the GPU is reused by the system.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The key question then is the memory of boot kernel still in
> > > > > > place
> > > > > > during
> > > > > > the hibernate restore phase?
> > > > >
> > > > > Before restoring the image all devices are quiesced by
> > > > > calling their
> > > > > freeze callback, so the GPU should be idle already
> > > > > in i915_pm_restore_early() already.
> > > >
> > > > But this happens in the loader kernel, so if that doesn't have
> > > > the
> > > > driver built-in then the freeze callback won't be called
> > > > either. So any
> > > > possible BIOS related GPU activity/setup should be quiesced
> > > > from the
> > > > restore callback then.
> > >
> > > I thought the loader kernel has an entire initrd attached, to
> > > allow stuff
> > > like typing in the disk encryption passwd. Which means we very
> > > much do
> > > load i915 in the loader kernel already.
> >
> > AFAICS, the hibernation image is restored from a late_initcall and
> > so
> > /bin/init etc. won't be run in the loader kernel and so the driver
> > won't be loaded if built as a module.
>
> Well, on many systems, it's explicitly triggered from initrd (at
> least, (open)SUSE does it so since ages ago). dracut does it after
> the whole driver initializations on initrd, usually.
Right, with manual resume that will work. But it's still possible not
to have the driver configured or use kernel resume (passing resume=..).
> > But in theory at least it's
> > possible that the driver won't even be configured in the loader
> > kernel.
> >
> > > So maybe we need to throw a gpu reset into the right hook
> > > (shutdown or
> > > whatever it was) to make sure the loader kernel really stops all
> > > gpu write
> > > cycles, including anything done due to power saving context
> > > restoring.
> >
> > The callback called right before the hibernation image is restored
> > is
> > freeze. Shutdown is called only after creating the image, before
> > powering off.
>
> Hmm, this always confuses me. Is the freeze callback called to the
> loader kernel?
It's called both in loader and target kernel, before creating or
restoring the image.
--Imre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-29 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 13:11 S4 resume breakage with i915 driver Takashi Iwai
2016-08-25 15:32 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-25 15:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-25 16:12 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-25 16:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-26 9:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-26 10:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-26 10:39 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-26 11:10 ` Imre Deak
2016-08-26 11:42 ` Imre Deak
2016-08-29 13:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29 14:09 ` Imre Deak
2016-08-29 14:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-29 14:54 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2016-08-29 15:25 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 16:46 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-08-30 11:43 ` Imre Deak
2016-08-30 11:33 ` Imre Deak
2016-09-02 18:34 ` Dave Gordon
2016-08-26 12:29 ` David Weinehall
2016-08-26 12:38 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-26 12:54 ` David Weinehall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472482485.4707.13.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox