From: "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Kumar, Mahesh1" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FOR_UPSTREAM [VPG]: drm/i915/skl+: Implement Transition WM
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:47:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472651265.2387.20.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472585549.2387.15.camel@intel.com>
Em Ter, 2016-08-30 às 19:32 +0000, Zanoni, Paulo R escreveu:
> Hi
>
> Em Seg, 2016-08-29 às 18:05 +0530, Kumar, Mahesh escreveu:
> >
> > This patch enables Transition WM for SKL+ platforms.
> >
> > Transition WM are used if IPC is enabled, to decide, number of
> > blocks
> > to be fetched before reducing the priority of display to fetch from
> > memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 57
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 9f69050..f4f387f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -2861,6 +2861,8 @@ bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device
> > *dev)
> > #define SKL_DDB_SIZE 896 /* in blocks */
> > #define BXT_DDB_SIZE 512
> > #define SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME 30 /* µs */
> > +#define SKL_TRANS_WM_AMOUNT 10
> > +#define SKL_TRANS_WM_MIN 14
>
> As far as I understood (and maybe I'm wrong), SKL_TRANS_WM_AMOUNT is
> a
> tunable value, so it depends on a lot of variable factors. Why does
> this patch use 10 instead of every other possible value?
I kept investigating and it seems that the current recommendation is
still that transition watermarks stay disabled for SKL and KBL.
>
> Thanks,
> Paulo
>
>
> >
> >
> > /*
> > * Return the index of a plane in the SKL DDB and wm result
> > arrays. Primary
> > @@ -3579,6 +3581,41 @@ static uint32_t
> > skl_adjusted_plane_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cst
> > return pixel_rate;
> > }
> >
> > +static void skl_compute_plane_trans_wm(const struct
> > drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > + struct skl_pipe_wm
> > *pipe_wm,
> > + struct intel_plane_state
> > *intel_pstate,
> > + uint32_t y_tile_min,
> > + bool y_tile)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_plane_state *pstate = &intel_pstate->base;
> > + int id = skl_wm_plane_id(to_intel_plane(pstate->plane));
> > + uint16_t *out_blocks = &pipe_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_b[id];
> > + uint8_t *out_lines = &pipe_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_l[id];
> > + uint16_t res_blocks = pipe_wm->wm[0].plane_res_b[id];
> > + uint32_t trans_min = 0, trans_offset_blocks;
> > + uint16_t trans_y_tile_min = 0;
> > + uint16_t trans_res_blocks;
> > +
> > +
> > + if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv))
> > + trans_min = SKL_TRANS_WM_MIN;
> > +
> > + trans_offset_blocks = trans_min + SKL_TRANS_WM_AMOUNT;
> > +
> > + if (y_tile) {
> > + trans_y_tile_min = 2 * y_tile_min;
> > + trans_res_blocks = max(trans_y_tile_min,
> > res_blocks)
> > +
> > + trans_offset_blocks;
> > + } else {
> > + trans_res_blocks = res_blocks +
> > trans_offset_blocks;
> > + /* WA BUG:1938466 add one block for non y-tile
> > planes */
> > + trans_res_blocks += 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *out_blocks = trans_res_blocks;
> > + *out_lines = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> > struct intel_plane_state
> > *intel_pstate,
> > @@ -3600,6 +3637,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > struct skl_wm_level *result = &pipe_wm->wm[level];
> > uint16_t *out_blocks = &result->plane_res_b[id];
> > uint8_t *out_lines = &result->plane_res_l[id];
> > + uint32_t y_tile_minimum = 0;
> > + bool y_tile = false;
> >
> > if (latency == 0 || !cstate->base.active || !intel_pstate-
> > >
> > > base.visible)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -3627,7 +3666,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> > fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> > uint32_t min_scanlines = 4;
> > - uint32_t y_tile_minimum;
> > if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(pstate->rotation)) {
> > int cpp = (fb->pixel_format ==
> > DRM_FORMAT_NV12) ?
> > drm_format_plane_cpp(fb-
> > >
> > > pixel_format, 1) :
> > @@ -3646,6 +3684,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > }
> > y_tile_minimum = plane_blocks_per_line *
> > min_scanlines;
> > selected_result = max(method2, y_tile_minimum);
> > + y_tile = true;
> > } else {
> > linetime_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(width * 1000,
> > skl_pipe_pixel_rate(cstate));
> > @@ -3669,6 +3708,9 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > *out_blocks = res_blocks;
> > *out_lines = res_lines;
> >
> > + if (level == 0)
> > + skl_compute_plane_trans_wm(dev_priv, pipe_wm,
> > intel_pstate,
> > + y_tile_minimum,
> > y_tile);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3738,11 +3780,13 @@ skl_compute_linetime_wm(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> > }
> >
> > static void skl_compute_transition_wm(struct intel_crtc_state
> > *cstate,
> > - struct skl_wm_level
> > *trans_wm
> > /* out */)
> > + struct skl_wm_level
> > *trans_wm,
> > + struct skl_ddb_allocation
> > *ddb)
> > {
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc = cstate->base.crtc;
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > struct intel_plane *intel_plane;
> > + enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
> >
> > if (!cstate->base.active)
> > return;
> > @@ -3750,8 +3794,13 @@ static void skl_compute_transition_wm(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> > /* Until we know more, just disable transition WMs */
> > for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(crtc->dev, intel_crtc,
> > intel_plane) {
> > int i = skl_wm_plane_id(intel_plane);
> > + uint16_t plane_ddb = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb-
> > >
> > > plane[pipe][i]);
> > + uint16_t trans_res_blocks = trans_wm-
> > >
> > > plane_res_b[i];
> >
> > - trans_wm->plane_en[i] = false;
> > + if ((plane_ddb == 0) || (trans_res_blocks >
> > plane_ddb))
> > + trans_wm->plane_en[i] = false;
> > + else
> > + trans_wm->plane_en[i] = true;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3782,7 +3831,7 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> >
> > pipe_wm->linetime = skl_compute_linetime_wm(cstate);
> >
> > - skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &pipe_wm->trans_wm);
> > + skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &pipe_wm->trans_wm,
> > ddb);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 12:35 [PATCH 0/7] Implement New DDB allocation algorithm Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/hsw+: set intel_crtc active once pipe is active Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-30 19:18 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-08-31 10:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-08-31 14:04 ` Mahesh Kumar
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/skl+: use linetime latency instead of ddb size Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/skl: pass pipe_wm in skl_compute_(wm_level/plane_wm) functions Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-31 13:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-08-31 14:18 ` Mahesh Kumar
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Decode system memory bandwidth Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH] FOR_UPSTREAM [VPG]: drm/i915/skl+: Implement Transition WM Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-30 19:32 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-08-31 13:47 ` Zanoni, Paulo R [this message]
2016-09-02 11:46 ` Mahesh Kumar
2016-09-02 12:21 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: WM memory bandwidth related workaround Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] New DDB Algo and WM fixes Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/skl: pass pipe_wm in skl_compute_(wm_level/plane_wm) functions Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/skl+: use linetime latency instead of ddb size Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915: Decode system memory bandwidth Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915/gen9: WM memory bandwidth related workaround Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/skl+: change WM calc to fixed point 16.16 Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/bxt: Enable IPC support Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/bxt: set chicken bit as IPC y-tile WA Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/bxt: Implement Transition WM Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Implement New DDB allocation algorithm Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472651265.2387.20.camel@intel.com \
--to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox