* [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture
@ 2016-09-06 7:38 Chris Wilson
2016-09-06 7:49 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-09-06 8:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2016-09-06 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
If we can't grab the breadcrumb's spinlock, possibly due to a driver
deadlock inside the waiters, ignore them. Like hangcheck, error
capturing must work no matter how the driver/GPU dies.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 929db40a3925..14890850ecb1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -489,7 +489,10 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
}
}
- if (ee->num_waiters) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ee->waiters)) {
+ err_printf(m, "%s --- ? waiters [unable to acquire spinlock]\n",
+ dev_priv->engine[i].name);
+ } else if (ee->num_waiters) {
err_printf(m, "%s --- %d waiters\n",
dev_priv->engine[i].name,
ee->num_waiters);
@@ -648,7 +651,8 @@ static void i915_error_state_free(struct kref *error_ref)
i915_error_object_free(ee->wa_ctx);
kfree(ee->requests);
- kfree(ee->waiters);
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ee->waiters))
+ kfree(ee->waiters);
}
i915_error_object_free(error->semaphore);
@@ -933,7 +937,14 @@ static void error_record_engine_waiters(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
ee->num_waiters = 0;
ee->waiters = NULL;
- spin_lock(&b->lock);
+ if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&b->waiters))
+ return;
+
+ if (!spin_trylock(&b->lock)) {
+ ee->waiters = ERR_PTR(-EDEADLK);
+ return;
+ }
+
count = 0;
for (rb = rb_first(&b->waiters); rb != NULL; rb = rb_next(rb))
count++;
@@ -947,9 +958,13 @@ static void error_record_engine_waiters(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (!waiter)
return;
- ee->waiters = waiter;
+ if (!spin_trylock(&b->lock)) {
+ kfree(waiter);
+ ee->waiters = ERR_PTR(-EDEADLK);
+ return;
+ }
- spin_lock(&b->lock);
+ ee->waiters = waiter;
for (rb = rb_first(&b->waiters); rb; rb = rb_next(rb)) {
struct intel_wait *w = container_of(rb, typeof(*w), node);
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture
2016-09-06 7:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture Chris Wilson
@ 2016-09-06 7:49 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-09-06 8:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2016-09-06 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On ti, 2016-09-06 at 08:38 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we can't grab the breadcrumb's spinlock, possibly due to a driver
> deadlock inside the waiters, ignore them. Like hangcheck, error
> capturing must work no matter how the driver/GPU dies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture
2016-09-06 7:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture Chris Wilson
2016-09-06 7:49 ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2016-09-06 8:20 ` Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-09-06 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/12033/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 12033v1 drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/12033/revisions/1/mbox/
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b:
skip -> PASS (fi-hsw-4770r)
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
skip -> PASS (fi-skl-6260u)
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
skip -> PASS (fi-hsw-4770r)
fi-bdw-5557u total:252 pass:233 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:15
fi-bsw-n3050 total:252 pass:203 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:46
fi-byt-n2820 total:252 pass:206 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:41
fi-hsw-4770k total:252 pass:226 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:22
fi-hsw-4770r total:252 pass:222 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:26
fi-ivb-3520m total:252 pass:217 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:31
fi-skl-6260u total:252 pass:234 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:14
fi-skl-6700k total:252 pass:219 dwarn:3 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:28
fi-snb-2520m total:252 pass:204 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:2 skip:43
fi-snb-2600 total:252 pass:205 dwarn:2 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:43
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_2473/
9baa666b3e48f71b46c5f63541f57d2a95a1b1c0 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-09m-03d-12h-12m-15s UTC integration manifest
2dc0c55 drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-06 8:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-06 7:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't wait for a spinlock inside error capture Chris Wilson
2016-09-06 7:49 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-09-06 8:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox