From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Use new atomic iterator macros in wm code
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:53:32 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478195612.2535.91.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161103164904.GF4617@intel.com>
Em Qui, 2016-11-03 às 18:49 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:37:16PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
> > >
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 2df06b703e3d..163b73b493bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -3227,7 +3227,7 @@ skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *intel_cstate)
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Calculate and cache data rate for each plane */
> > - for_each_plane_in_state(state, plane, pstate, i) {
> > + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, pstate, i) {
>
> Looks like this patch needs a refresh due to my tardiness in
> reviewing
> it.
>
> Also unrelated, but I recently noticed that
> skl_get_total_relative_data_rate() doesn't exclude the cursor plane
> from the calculation. I'm thinking it should. Adding some Cc:s...
It seems we're safe because skl_plane_relative_data_rate() returns 0
for cursor. But an explicitly check at the caller would probably be
much much better instead of hidden deep in the code. OTOH, Matt's plans
to exclude cursor case-handling would remove this need again.
>
> >
> > id = skl_wm_plane_id(to_intel_plane(plane));
> > intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> >
> > @@ -3364,14 +3364,14 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> > alloc_size -= cursor_blocks;
> >
> > /* 1. Allocate the mininum required blocks for each active
> > plane */
> > - for_each_plane_in_state(state, plane, pstate, i) {
> > + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, pstate, i) {
> > intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> > id = skl_wm_plane_id(intel_plane);
> >
> > if (intel_plane->pipe != pipe)
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (!to_intel_plane_state(pstate)->base.visible) {
> > + if (!pstate->visible) {
> > minimum[id] = 0;
> > y_minimum[id] = 0;
> > continue;
> > @@ -3933,7 +3933,7 @@ pipes_modified(struct drm_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > struct drm_crtc_state *cstate;
> > uint32_t i, ret = 0;
> >
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i)
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i)
> > ret |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
> >
> > return ret;
> > @@ -4048,7 +4048,7 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > * since any racing commits that want to update them would
> > need to
> > * hold _all_ CRTC state mutexes.
> > */
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i)
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i)
> > changed = true;
> > if (!changed)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -4070,7 +4070,7 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > * should allow skl_update_pipe_wm() to return failure in
> > cases where
> > * no suitable watermark values can be found.
> > */
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i) {
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i) {
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc =
> > to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > struct intel_crtc_state *intel_cstate =
> > to_intel_crtc_state(cstate);
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 12:36 [PATCH 00/19] drm/atomic: Use less confusing iterator names Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/atomic: Add new iterators over all state Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-01 13:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-01 13:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-01 13:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-02 8:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-16 12:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-08 8:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/atmel-hlcdc: Use new atomic iterator macros Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/exynos: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/blend: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 15:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/atomic: Make add_affected_connectors look at crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 15:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-08 8:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/atomic: Use new atomic iterator macros Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/atomic: Fix atomic helpers to use the new " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 16:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-08 8:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/vc4: Use new atomic " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/rockchip: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/rcar-du: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/omap: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/msm: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 16:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/imx: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/mediatek: " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 16:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: Use new atomic iterator macros in ddi Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 17:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915: Use new atomic iterator macros in fbc Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 16:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-03 17:45 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-11-03 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-03 17:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Use new atomic iterator macros in wm code Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-03 17:53 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915: Use new atomic iterator macros in display code Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 17:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 12:37 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/atomic: Rename atomic oldnew iterator Maarten Lankhorst
2016-11-03 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-17 13:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/atomic: Use less confusing iterator names Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478195612.2535.91.camel@intel.com \
--to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).