* [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
@ 2016-11-20 17:50 sunil.kamath
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-21 11:46 ` [PATCH] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sunil.kamath @ 2016-11-20 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: ander.conselvan.de.oliveira
From: "A.Sunil Kamath" <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info.
This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing
second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform.
Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users,
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id);
- for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) {
struct intel_scaler *sc =
&pipe_config->scaler_state.scalers[i];
--
2.8.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
2016-11-20 17:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs sunil.kamath
@ 2016-11-20 18:16 ` Patchwork
2016-11-21 11:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-11-21 11:46 ` [PATCH] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-11-20 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamath, Sunil; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15621/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 15621v1 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15621/revisions/1/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
accd56d36a298219042d84ba9ee1b7bd66d1936c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-11m-18d-22h-35m-31s UTC integration manifest
da14388 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3064/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2016-11-21 11:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2016-11-21 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Kamath, Sunil
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 18:16 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15621/
> State : success
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 15621v1 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15621/revisions/1/mbox/
>
>
> fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
> fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
> fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
> fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
>
> accd56d36a298219042d84ba9ee1b7bd66d1936c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-11m-18d-22h-
> 35m-31s UTC integration manifest
> da14388 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3064/
Pushed. Thankd for the patch.
Ander
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
2016-11-20 17:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs sunil.kamath
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2016-11-21 11:46 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2016-11-21 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sunil.kamath, intel-gfx
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 23:20 +0530, sunil.kamath@intel.com wrote:
> From: "A.Sunil Kamath" <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
>
> Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info.
> This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing
> second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct
> intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users,
> pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) {
> struct intel_scaler *sc =
> &pipe_config-
> >scaler_state.scalers[i];
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-21 11:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-20 17:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs sunil.kamath
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-21 11:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-11-21 11:46 ` [PATCH] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).