From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write (rev2)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 16:45:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480689917.17322.12.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161128171526.30701.15805@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On ma, 2016-11-28 at 17:15 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16046/
> State : success
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 16046v2 Series without cover letter
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16046/revisions/2/mbox/
I pushed 1/3 to -dinq, thanks for the review. I'll send an updated
version of the other 2, doing the polling first w/o disabling
preemption. According to Art and my tests that should succeed most of
the time, so we'd need the preempt-disabled poll only as a fallback.
> fi-bdw-5557u total:245 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
> fi-bsw-n3050 total:245 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
> fi-bxt-t5700 total:245 pass:217 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> fi-byt-j1900 total:245 pass:217 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> fi-byt-n2820 total:245 pass:213 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-hsw-4770 total:245 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-hsw-4770r total:245 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-ilk-650 total:245 pass:192 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
> fi-ivb-3520m total:245 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-ivb-3770 total:245 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-kbl-7500u total:245 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-skl-6260u total:245 pass:231 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-skl-6700hq total:245 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6700k total:245 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6770hq total:245 pass:231 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-snb-2520m total:245 pass:213 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-snb-2600 total:245 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
>
> 477cc06f6ef4842fd63e28ff30d721462af199a6 drm-tip: 2016y-11m-28d-16h-17m-39s UTC integration manifest
> b82f611 drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during SAGV disabling
> 97b0290 drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK change notification
> 50aec7a4c drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3128/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-02 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-28 15:29 [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during CDCLK change notification Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-28 16:12 ` Imre Deak
2016-11-28 16:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-28 16:40 ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2016-11-28 17:13 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-28 18:55 ` Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/gen9: Fix PCODE polling during SAGV disabling Imre Deak
2016-11-28 15:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write Patchwork
2016-11-28 17:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/gen6+: Clear upper data byte during PCODE write (rev2) Patchwork
2016-12-02 14:45 ` Imre Deak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480689917.17322.12.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox